2010_fusion_dsc1454While Toyota might be the king of the Hybrids, all they have done is put a huge bulls eye on their company’s forehead. With the Prius perched as the best selling hybrid, they sure have made every other car manufacturer play a serious game of catch up. Whether it’s Chevy’s lackluster Malibu Hybrid, Nissan’s borrowed Synergy Drive, or a new Ford product, it’s quite a mountain to climb.

Of everyone though, it seems Ford is taking the challenge full force. They’ve answered back to Toyota with the fantastic Fusion Hybrid, and have quite a lofty goal set up for it: 1,000 miles on a tank of gas. That’s right, 1,000 miles, 43 hours straight, and they plan to start on the morning of the April 25th. By the 27th, we’ll know if it’s possible.

Ford’s marketing plan for this is even bolder than when Volkswagen towed a Boeing 747 with their diesel powered Touareg a few years back. Where as VW was looking to promote an engine, Ford is looking to promote a way of life and their companies direction. Educating consumers about your product while helping educate gas saving tips to the whole automotive community is a fantastic way to reinforce your companies commitment to the future of hybrid technology, rather than just having a vulgar display of brute power.

10fusionhybrid_12

This task won’t be an easy one, but Ford has been thinking ahead. Part of their strategy involves:

  • Slowing down and maintaining even throttle pressure;
  • Gradually accelerating and smoothly braking;
  • Maintaining a safe distance between vehicles and anticipating traffic conditions;
  • Coasting up to red lights and stop signs to avoid fuel waste and brake wear;
  • Minimize use of heater and air conditioning to reduce the load on the engine;
  • Close windows at high speeds to reduce aerodynamic drag;
  • Applying the “Pulse and Glide” technique while maintaining the flow of traffic;
  • Minimize excessive engine workload by using the vehicle’s kinetic forward motion to climb hills, and use downhill momentum to build speed; and
  • Avoiding bumps and potholes that can reduce momentum

10fusionhybrid_28During the event, Ford will be teaching these techniques in their Fusion Hybrid to the public, cementing the fact that how you drive has the biggest impact on the real world mileage you get. Updates on the progress of their challenge can be found on YouTube, Facebook, and twitter.

Ford has high confidence that their Fusion will perform. Ford has stated achieving 70MPG proved to be possible while hypermiling, and this 1,000 mile test only requires an average of 57MPG. While it is possible to hypermile a Prius to a figure north of that, the Fusion is a much better all around car, owing to better looks, sportier driving dynamics, and increased size. The cross hairs are pointed right at the bullseye Toyota set up, so check back soon and we’ll see if Fords gunmen have the skills to take the shot.

-KF

1968 Ford Mustang 428 CobraJet.

1968 Ford Mustang 428 Cobra Jet. The baddest of the badass Mustangs.

The Ford Mustang turned 45 years old today. It’s been a glorious, sometimes questionable, 45 years. From being born as a secretary’s car, the Mustang had its fair share of ups and downs. This pony car was at one time a trendsetting muscle car, a reskinned Pinto, reclaimed its crown as the top pony car, to the last surviving car of its class. Needless to say that the Mustang has a huge following in the U.S. and overseas.

Speaking of overseas, the upstart automaker Hyundai (whose been on a mission to pimp slap its competitors in recent months) made this viral video congratulating Ford on the accomplishment of producing the Mustang for 45 straight years.

Please watch the following video and determine if they are being sincere or if they are pimp slappin’ Ford?

-KF

1965 Ford Mustang. A secretarys' car.

1965 Ford Mustang. A secretary's car.

The venerable Ford Mustang has a few trivial facts. Some of you might already know that in 1963, the Ford brass re-skinned the slow selling Falcon as a new secretary’s car. Under Lee Iacocca’s supervision, the Falcon became the Mustang (why don’t we name cars after animals anymore?). Also the name Mustang came from the WWII fighter plane, not the horse.

This new secretary’s car was designed by a Japanese designer. Because of the name ‘Mustang’, the category of these nostalgic rides is called the ‘Pony Car’. Pony cars now include Camaros and Firebirds.

It wasn’t until Carroll Shelby (Mr. Cobra, himself) created the GT350 by shoving a 350 V8 under the pony car’s hood, that this secretary’s car was made into a beast of a muscle car that we know and love today.

1989 Ford Probe. This could have been the new Mustang.

1989 Ford Probe. This could have been the new Mustang.

1987 Ford Mustang. The Aero Fox Body Mustang.

1987 Ford Mustang. The Aero Fox Body Mustang.

Also, these pony cars were such a huge sales hit, that the first year’s sales of the Ford Mustang still stands as the best new model debut, which stands close to 686,000 units.

The fact that most people don’t know is that in the mid-1980′s, Ford wanted to replace the Mustang with a front-wheel drive car. The front wheel drive chassis was to be shared with the newly acquired Mazda. Did you guess what that car is?

Yep, Ford Probe was the new Mustang… at least until 1986.

With an overwhelming negative response from the Mustang fans and owners, Ford updated the design in 1987. It was mainly the mullet wearing Mustang fanboys who couldn’t fathom the thought that their favorite car was Japanese under the skin, and front wheel drive. We wholeheartedly agree that the Mustang wouldn’t be a Mustang, if it was front wheel drive (a la Mustang II of the mid-1970′s). The 1987 redesign came to be known as the Aero Fox Body Mustang… does anyone remember the Vanilla Ice video?

Then the Probe was introduced in 1988 as a 1989 model.

We could have had a Probestang?

-KF

Mr. Alan Mulally. Yes! Pump your fist, you've earned the right!

Mr. Alan Mulally. Yes! Pump your fist, you've earned the right!

The struggles of the ‘big three’ (Ford, GM, and Chrysler) American automotive giants’ are well documented. As recently as about 18 months ago, the talk was that Ford was on it’s way to imminent bankruptcy and that GM looked to be the strongest of the bunch with Chrysler floundering hopelessly. Well Chrysler hasn’t changed much, but Ford and GM has done a flip-flop. It is GM that need billions and billions of dollars of government loans to stay out of bankruptcy, and Ford has made some financially sound moves to stay out of the apocalyptic trouble.

The best move that Ford has made so far is hiring Alan Mulally away from Boeing to head up the struggling company. He has done what other good businessman would have done with the company. Ford sold whatever assets it had to liquidate for cashflow, got rid of underperforming brands (Land Rover and Jaguar), and has done a marvelous job of cutting cost and restructuring the company. Almost sounds like Carlos Ghosn of Nissan-Renault; Mr. Ghosn’s nickname is ‘Le Cost Killer’.

Not too long ago, Ford fell in love with its own brand-image and designed all their cars to resemble its oval logo (see Ford Taurus and Escort of 1996-2006). When that failed, they took the brand-imaging even further and decided to change all its failing models’ nomenclature to start with the letter ‘F’ – after Ford. TheĀ  popular Escort was replaced with Focus, Contour became Fusion, Taurus had a brief stint with Five Hundred, and the company even introduced new models such as Freestar and Flex. Way to confuse your buying public…

Too often the automakers are quick to change names of the existing vehicles, hoping that the public would think that it is an all-new car, but they do not address the fundamental flaws of the failing model. Spending hundreds of millions of dollars on marketing, rather than spending that money and making the cars better. This is GM’s core problem.

Ford has spent some time with customer focus groups in the recent years, much like the imports brands, and looked at what people are valuing in vehicles: better and simple to use electronics (Microsoft Sync), powerful drivetrains that are environmentally responsible, and designs that draw attention. At the same time, Ford has worked hard at getting the reliability of its vehicles up to par with the imports. Also, the company is actively becoming a force as a digital communications leader. Mr. Mulally actually is on Twitter, along with a couple of high ranking executives in the Michigan HQ.

KarFarm is excited to review and compare Ford’s upcoming new vehicles with what the rest of the world has to offer. 2009 is going to be a year of rebirth at Ford, with the introduction of new Mustang, Fiesta, Taurus (SHO), F-150 and a few other vehicles that haven’t been announced yet.

-KF

Is it from being the icons of the automotive design? Or is it being afraid of getting criticized and back lashed for any new possible design direction?

The companies of Porsche, Aston Martin, and Rolls Royce all suffer from the Lazy Design Syndrome. Yes, there are very subtle differences between all their models. Of course, you can cheat and just go the rear of the car to look at the badges to distinguish the models. But, you would have to have a doctorate degree just to be able to tell the differences between their current models, even from the past ones.

Porsche

997

The current 911

The iconic, Hitler-commissioned, design of Ferdinand Porsche was used for both VW Beetle and the later Porsche 911. Since 1963 one could argue that, in essence, the 911 is the same basic design. A victim of its own success, Porsche has been trying to replace this model so many times with superior chassis. But from the public outcry of its fans and customers, Porsche is forced to keep updating this almost 70 year old design.

What makes it offensive is not the refreshment of the 911 design, but making every new Porsche models (since the 1990′s) a variation of the 911. Porsche needs to stop bastardizing the 911 design and actually make some interesting cars, take the 924 and 928 for example.

The Boxster is smaller version of 911. The Cayman is a Boxster with the top on it, which is a smaller 911. Cayenne is basically a VW Touareg with a 911 nose. Finally, the upcoming Panamera looks like a Cayman with 4 doors and a funny rear-end, with the vestiges of the 911 design. The only exception to the 911 rule being the Porsche Carrera GT, but even the mighty GT carries the 911′s grinning front bumper and Boxster’s tail lamps.

Rolls Royce

Aside from the modern touches, it looks like Rollers from yester year.

Aside from the modern touches, it looks like Rollers from yester year.

The legendary Rolls Royce has a long, rich history of being the world’s best car, an opinion mostly shared by the British motoring press and historians. But if you were to look at a Rolls Royce of the 1960′s and RR of today, not too much has changed. Yes, the windows are more flush; thanks to advancements in automotive manufacturing techniques.

It is as if they are basically telling it’s buyers not to worry about their cars going out of style. Perhaps, they’ve run out of funding to pay its designers. Please, give us a different looking Rolls in the future. You can follow Bentley’s lead, as even though their Continental might be Audi/VW based, it’s a great looking car.

Aston Martin

Guess this varient of the Aston line up. Time's up. It's a DB9

Guess this variant of the Aston line up. Time's up. It's a DB9

Here’s a company that takes the whole Lazy Design Syndrome to another level. Aston Martin designers must be narcissistic or are elitists. Much like Rolls Royce, another UK company, they make one design and decide this is what you’re going to get. It just might be Ford’s doing when they purchased the car company in the mid-1990′s, which coincides with the beginning of Aston’s LDS (Lazy Design Syndrome), or maybe movie producers of ’007′ films told them that they cannot produce any other Aston Martin design for James Bond. Whatever it is, it’s tragic. From DB9, Vanquish, Vantage, to the upcoming One-77, they are all basically the same car. Actually, this basic design goes back to DB7.

We’ve had three James Bond changes in the time of DB7 to One-77. Isn’t it time for a change in Aston Martin design?

-KF