I’m not trying to pick on Nissan, but here’s something interesting: In July, 2010, sales of the very large Nissan Armada SUV above were up 311.4%. Sales of the Xterra SUV were up 56.6%. On the flip side, sales of the subcompact Nissan Cube were down 54%. Sales of the equally subcompact Nissan Versa were down 9.4%. This isn’t meant to bash SUVs—I’m not an SUV hater—it’s meant to show that in July, 2010, sales of large vehicles were up, and sales of small cars were down, and not just at Nissan.

It’s been said Americans have short memories. This could certainly be said for car buying trends, at least with regards to vehicle size and fuel efficacy. Gas prices have held relatively steady over the last year—the average price is still under $3.00 a gallon, although on the rise—and Americans have decided to buy larger, thirstier cars again. At least that’s what July’s sales data suggest.

July was a good month for the majority of automakers offering vehicles in the States. However, it was the bigger vehicles leading the charge, even though there’s more small cars on the market than in recent history. Autoblog, for example, reported Honda’s Civic was down 25.5% while the Pilot was up 45.4% (the Fit was down 29.5%). Nissan’s car division was down 3.7%, but its trucks went up 51%. As I reported on Tuesday, all b-segment cars on the U.S. market (sans the Kia Rio and Kia Soul; +99.7% and +65.9%, respectively) experienced a drop in sales compared to this time in 2009.

It’s not like Americans don’t have small options these days, it’s quite the contrary. There are more small car choices these days than since the 1980s, and they’re almost undoubtedly the best small cars ever to grace American soil. Even with the not-so-stellar economy, gas prices that still aren’t “cheap,” and many great smaller options, the slow sales of small cars says something about U.S. consumers: They like big vehicles and fuel economy isn’t as important as many want to think.

How soon people forget. Remember when gas prices approached $5.00 a gallon in places? It wasn’t very long ago. Remember saving money by driving a car that got 25 MPG vs. 15? Of course a subcompact, compact, or even a “car” doesn’t fit everyone’s bill. But, they likely fit more lifestyles then many people would want to believe. It’s the “bigger is better” mentality.

Hey, I’m the last person on Earth that’s going to tell someone what they have to buy. Some people need pickups, SUVs, and minivans (most “minivans” aren’t very “mini” anymore if you haven’t noticed), and you do have the freedom to buy whatever the hell you want—that’s fine. But I’d bet gas prices will rise again and used car lots will once again be strewn with copious amounts of large, gas-guzzling vehicles. I just figure it’s a matter of if not when.

Clearly, Americans decided to buy big with their vehicle purchases—at least in July—despite the influx of great small vehicles. But is this spike in bigger vehicle sales simply a blip on the radar, or is this a return to buying bigger and less fuel-efficient again? Assuming gas prices stay around where they are, the next few months should be good indicators.

Courtesy of our content partner – Subcompact Culture


Every now and then a car comes along which defies categorizing. The Nissan GT-R is one of these cars. Too inexpensive and attainable to be a super-exotic, but far too high-performance to be a car for the masses. And yet, here it is.

More to the point, here we are with the keys in hand and a great road to drive. Everyday Driver vs. Godzilla, the genre killer from the orient. The technology in this car is very similar to the Mitsubishi Evo, which we love, but is the GT-R worth twice as much? The guys grab this monster by the tail for a wild ride.

Many of you requested we drive this car, and we hope you have as much fun watching as we did driving. And in a few years the prices for a used GT-R will drop to the levels of other sportscars. Then you’ll have a decision to make.

Go HD-full screen, and turn it up!

Courtesy of our content partner – Everyday Driver


Where was I the last couple of days? I was at the Northwest Automotive Press Association’s (NWAPA) “Run to the Sun.” This annual driving event brings a number of new cars and NWAPA members together for a multi-day driving extravaganza.

The field featured a variety of cars from various segments from entry level to ultra luxury. The list looked like this:

- 2010 Acura TL SH-AWD Tech
- 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
- 2010 Chevrolet Corvette GS Convertible
- 2010 Dodge Challenger R/T
- 2010 Viper SRT10 Coupe
- 2011 Ford Mustang GT Premium
- 2011 Honda CR-Z EX w/Navigation
- 2011 Hyundai Sonata GLS
- 2011 Infiniti M37X AWD
- 2010 Jaguar XFR
- 2010 Jaguar XKR Convertible
- 2010 Kia Forte Koup SX
- 2010 Lexus IS350 Convertible (w/F-Sport parts)


- 2010 Lotus Evora
- 2010 Mazdaspeed3
- 2011 Mercedes-Benz E550 Cabriolet
- 2011 Mercedes SLS AMG
- 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback Ralliart
- Mitsubishi iMiEV
- 2010 Nissan Z Roadster
- 2011 Subaru Impreza WRX STI
- Suzuki Kizashi Turbo Concept
- 2011 Volvo C70 T5 Convertible
- 2010 Volkswagen Jetta TDI Cup Edition

Over the course of three days, I got to drive each one of these cars on some great roads in northwestern Washington. There were a number of remarkable cars. Here are just a couple that really stood out:

Favorite Overall Car: 2011 Ford Mustang GT
Why: I’m a long-time Mustang fan, and the ’11 GT is the total package. They’ve brought the 5.0 back with dual overhead cams, a 7,000 RPM readline, and lots of thrust (412 hp, 390 ft/lbs. of torque). But, it’s more than that. The outstanding combination of comfort, handling, obtainable price, and sound make this such a complete, well-executed package. This American icon continues to be iconic.

Biggest Surprise: Cadillac CTS-V
Why: The CTS-V is a supercharged 6.2-liter V-8-powered luxury sport sedan. I knew it’d be fast, and figured it’d be a “nice” car. However, I didn’t expect it to be as fast or as nice as it was. It goes like hell, sounds like heaven, and has a cool interior (the speedometer and tachometer leave red trails as they rev up—really neat). Here again, the combination of suspension tuning, interior quality, outstanding exhaust note, and overall badassness really impressed me. It’s great to see American cars that are truly impressive!

Favorite Small Car: Honda CR-Z
Why: Hey, this is Subcompact Culture, right? Of the smaller vehicles at the event (not including the excellent Lotus Evora), the Honda CR-Z was a standout, and not just because it’s brand-spakin’ new. The combination of size, shape, and driving dynamics confirmed that the CR-Z is a fun, frugal, and reasonably priced car. The interior is appealing, the exterior looks better in person, and if driven like a hybrid in Eco mode, you will get better-than-EPA-rated fuel economy.

Most Amazing: Mercedes AMG SLS; Viper SRT10 (tie)
Why: Equally amazing cars for way different reasons. It’s a tale of the scalpel versus the sledgehammer. The AMG SLS is extremely fast, yet is easy to pilot, Its gorgeous, inviting and comfortable interior features gullwinged gateways. All superheros should be gifted an SLS AMG.

The Viper is punishingly fast and is more than two handfuls to control. Viper allows you to sit inside it and then makes you hold on for dear life under full throttle. The automotive equivalent of trying to ride a bull. Make that a rabid bull possessed by the devil—but in a totally good way.

They’re both stupendously powerful, perversely extreme in many aspects, and get more stares than Megan Fox at a nude corndog eating contest. And I’ve said too much.

Expect to see some more driving reports about these vehicles soon!

Source – Subcompact Culture

Cruising through MyNissanLeaf, we came across a fantastic post by planet4ever. I’ve been really excited that I found this messageboard for awhile now (even linked to it from the Boardwalk Nissan Home Page), and it’s finds like this that prove how useful, and how community oriented boards like that can be. planet4ever took his time to scour NissanUSA’s website, and found multiple .pdf files that have all the information about the tax credits, rebates, discounts, parking and the list goes on.

Thanks to his hard work, here is the motherload of links to show you how all the programs work on the Nissan Leaf, across all the states. Who knew if you had a Nissan Leaf in San Jose, you can park in some metered spots for free!

Federal

Arizona

California

Colorado

Connecticut

District of Columbia

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii

Illinois

Iowa

Louisiana

Maryland

Michigan

Missouri

Nevada

New Jersey

New York

Oklahoma

Oregon

Rhode Island

South Carolina

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Virginia

Washington

Thank you again for all of the hard work planet4ever!

-KF

Source – nissanleafelectric blog

Oh yes, this is awesome. Reminds me of the old Nissan 300ZX toy commercial from the ’90s. The only thing better would be if a real SE-R could do half this stuff. FYI, this ad is from Nissan Canada. Eh.

Below is the making of the video.

Courtesy of our content partner: Subcompact Culture


Nissan’s all-electric Leaf now has a price: $32,780. There are up to $7,500 in federal tax credits, which will bring the price down to as low as $25,280. Consumers can also lease the Leaf for $349 a month, not including state or local incentives, which could further reduce the net cost of the Nissan Leaf. This includes three years of roadside assistance, too.

Additionally, there are an array of state and local incentives that may further defray the costs and increase the benefits of owning and charging a Nissan Leaf , such as a $5,000 statewide tax rebate in California; a $5,000 tax credit in Georgia; a $1,500 tax credit in Oregon; and carpool-lane access in some states, including California.

Nissan is managing the purchase process from the first step, when consumers sign up on NissanUSA.com, until the customer takes the Nissan Leaf home and plugs it into a personal charging dock.

Speaking of charging , the dock will cost an average of $2,200; up to $2,000 of that may be eligible for a 50% federal tax credit. Nissan claims each “fill up” will coast less than $3.

Courtesy of our content partner: Subcompact Culture


2010 Nissan cube 1.8 S

Vital Stats

Engine: 1.8 liter I4 (122HP/127TQ)
Drivetrain Layout: Front engine/Front wheel drive
Transmission: CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission)
Seating Capacity: 5 Passengers
EPA Fuel Economy: 27 city/31 highway
Base MSRP $16,030 + $720 (destination charge)
Recommended Options: Interior Designer Package $230

The Basics
Way back in 1998, Nissan introduced the Cube in Japan to cover the gap between their smallest car (March/Micra) and the compact car (Sunny/Sentra). It was labeled as a mini-MPV (multi-purpose vehicle), and it sort of looked like a tiny minivan. Little did they know that the Cube would be a trendsetter for a whole new segment.

At first, the Cube wasn’t a big seller or did it stand out from the crowd all that much. It wasn’t until the 2002 model (the start of the second generation), that the Cube became sort of an icon in Japan. The second generation Cube is immediately recognizable as a Cube of today, and came in many variants and options. To compete with the Cube, Toyota created the bB (which was imported to US as Scion xB).

Today, the third generation cube (note the lowercase ‘c’) is imported to US to compete with the Scion xB and the Kia Soul.

Highs: Fun and practical exterior and interior design, smooth driving dynamics, high class interior materials
Lows: Not as fun to drive as the competitors

Similar Vehicles: Scion xB, Kia Soul, Nissan Versa

Exterior (Tae – 7.5, Andy – 9, Brendan – 4)
Tae – Think of a block of ice that’s been sitting in the sun for a few minutes, and that’s basically how the cube looks like – a two-box design with rounded off corners. Nissan says the cube’s front end was meant to resemble a Bulldog with sunglasses… and I definitely see that. But the signature styling element of the cube is its wrap-around asymmetrical rear window.

Andy – Do you want something that doesn’t look like anything on the market? The cube is it. Indeed, the wrap-around rear glass is a unique feature which adds to the cubes avant garde styling. Other interesting features include the low-mounted taillights and ‘bulldog-esque’ front end. Plus, there isn’t a true 90-degree line to be found. Like many of these ‘box cars,’ styling is a love-it-or-hate-it affair. I love it; it’s my favorite looking vehicle in the segment, in fact.

Brendan -  Old people will do double takes in disgust, teenage boys will give you enthusiastic thumbs up, and your trendy fixie will look great on the roof. I’ve seemed to have missed the memo on the box cars, and I do not see their design appeal, and the lines are as  soft as week old Jell-O. Humans love symmetry normally, and although the front comes across bland, the rear comes across forced and awkward. If unique is what you are shooting for, you’ll have it here in spades though.

Interior (Tae – 7.5, Andy – 8.5, Brendan – 8)
Tae – Nissan designers wanted to create a spa-like serene feeling, and they’ve succeeded for the most part. The ceiling (headliner) has a rippled effect, much like pebble thrown into a pond, as does the door speaker grilles. The dashboard has a double curve, making it feel airy and bright. Most of the interior materials are great stuff, just like the Nissan Versa (cube’s platform-mate). The front seats are comfortable, but the backseat was a little cramped.

Andy – Although Nissan may have been going for a spa setting, I tend to think of the cube’s interior more as a rolling nightclub than a spa. Its funky styling, available 20-color interior mood lighting, and comfortable seats are cool. And although the seats are indeed really comfortable (and patterned with a funky, modern print), they aren’t very supportive and don’t hold you in the corners very well. However, on long trips, they’re downright cushy—kind of like a plush lounge chair! Unfortunately, the rear seat does not fold flat, hindering it from hauling large amounts of cargo. However, it is comfortable for four adults and some baggage.

Brendan – While I may be at odds with the exterior, the interior is great. In typical Nissan fashion, everything falls to hand easily, doesn’t feel any cheaper than it has to, and it’s easy to see out of. There are a few “interesting” features like the circle of shag pile carpet you can tape to the dash, but it’s a very comfortable place to spend time. This segment doesn’t push sportiness very much, so I appreciate the lack of aggressively bolstered front seats, as the mostly flat cushions work well.

Drivetrain (Tae – 7, Andy – 7, Brendan – 7)
Tae – If you have driven a Nissan Versa, then you already know what the cube feels like. Smooth engine, smooth transmission (CVT has no physical gears), but no excitement. Keyword – smoooooooooooooooth.

Andy – Tae is right: The engine and drivetrain are smooth, but not terribly exciting or engaging. The CVT works well in this vehicle, and provides adequate power.

Brendan – Is there an echo in this review? Smooth, boring, and just enough power to not be annoying. Average is the best term.

Performance (Tae – 6.5, Andy – 6.5, Brendan – 6)
Tae – Although the power is adequate, because it is paired with a CVT, it feels slow. That could be good or bad, depending on your view. Also, the handling isn’t as crisp as the Kia Soul or even the Scion xB. But let’s get real – you are not going to buy one of these for performance or handling. So, for what it is, it does its job very admirably.

Andy – The cube isn’t a slouch, but it isn’t a track star, either. It doesn’t have any issues keeping up with traffic, but it doesn’t feel like a drivers’ car. Driving dynamics are not bad, just not outstanding. Fuel economy also is good, but not amazing (it’s EPA rated at 27 city, 31 highway); I did hit the EPA 27 in mostly city driving.

Brendan – There is a little friskiness to be had, but you never get the feel that it enjoys being driven hard. It does everything mostly correctly, it just doesn’t beg for more. Limits are a little lower than I would have expected, but given that this car is a tarted up basic commuter, there are no complaints other than the overly soft brake pedal.

Ride Quality (Tae – 8, Andy – 9, Brendan – 7.5)
Tae – This department is where the cube shines. Just outstanding, almost luxury car like – also much like the Nissan Versa. The cube is well composed over bumps and almost never jostles, the noise level is very good, and the drivetrain feels muted. If I had to pick out a daily commuter, purely based on comfort, the cube would be the top choice.

Andy –  This is definitely the cruiser of the segment, and it does this very well. The ride is quite soft, which is comfortable on the highways and around town. The tradeoff is the cornering. The cube leans a lot in the curves, and those comfy seats I talked about don’t hold you in place well. If I had to describe the ride in one word, it’d be ‘comfortable.’

Brendan – While the marketing guru’s for Nissan have a lame name for them, the “Ripple Control Shocks” do work as advertised. It takes quite a bit to get the cube upset, and if you do, it tends to calm down quickly. Most small cars would be much better if they paid more attention to how Nissan worked their magic on the suspension. Only issue I found was a certain section of a rough concrete freeway that got the whole car vibrating like a cheap motel bed.

Technology (Tae – 7, Andy – 7, Brendan – 6)
Tae – As is with all the competitors in this segment, most of the ‘optional’ equipment are standard. The iPod and Bluetooth connectivity, traction control system, steering wheel controls, and all safety gadgets are all standard. Sadly, the 1.8 S model has the standard audio and after a brief listening of it, I can only deem it as average quality.

Andy – Tae is 100% right. If you want all the tech options, you’ll need to step up to the SL or Krom (pronounced ‘chrome’) models. However, the S model will get you the safety features as well as decent standard features. FYI, the upgraded SL’s Rockford-Fosgate stereo is outstanding.

Brendan – Technology? In this segment? It’ll play your music, connect with your phone,  and let you unlock from a distance. Pretty standard fare all in all. I agree with Andy though, the Rockford-Fosgate stereo is great.

Value (Tae – 7.5, Andy – 8, Brendan – 7)
Tae – Coming in at under $17k, it’s roughly about the same price as the Scion xB and similary equipped Kia Soul +. The cube and the Soul offer a few things that Scion cannot, factory incentives and dealer discounts, for example. Since the value proposition is pretty high in this segment, they are pretty much a wash.

Andy – This vehicle is pretty much on par with its competition. My guess is the cube’s resale will be a lot better than the Kia Soul’s, and probably equal if not better than the xB’s. Plus, its engine and chassis are proven pieces (from the Nissan Versa), so reliability should be good, too.

Brendan – My rating is a little lower than my partners in Box rating crime due to the fact that this is a tarted up Versa for Sentra money. While it’s priced right against the direct competition, if style isn’t the most important factor, you can find the same for less money.

Overall (Tae – 7, Andy – 8, Brendan – 7)
Tae – The Nissan cube is an interesting quandary, I suppose you can call it the ‘Goldilocks’ effect. Is it the fastest? No. Is it the best handling? No. Is it the most affordable? No. Is it the largest? No. Everything about the Nissan cube is in the comfortable ‘Goldilocks’ middle. It is the quietest, the most comfortable, and the smoothest ride among the Box trio.

Andy – The cube is a comfortable cruiser with a good amount of standard amenities, and should hold its value. It isn’t an athlete, but it’s not supposed to be. The super-funky look isn’t for everyone, but it also isn’t supposed to be.  If you plan on buying a small car and have a long commute, it will be hard to beat the cube for overall comfort. I think this is one of the most unique cars on the market, and won’t drain your wallet at the pump, either.

Brendan – An all around, well executed, if quirky car. If you take the time to enjoy your own quirks and enjoy the fact that you are a little against the grain while still being wonderful in many regards, this might just be the perfect car for you.

-KF

I really like the Nissan Cube. We’re now starting to see some custom gen-three Cubes come out of both Japan and the U.S. One of the best looking kitted out examples I’ve found I ran across on Nissan Cube Life. This Cube wears a host of Exclusive Zeus aero parts from Japan, including (I believe) the company’s wheels. So simple, so clean. I like.

Courtesy of our content partner: Subcompact Culture

2010 Nissan Z Coupe 370Z
Vital Stats

Engine: 3.7 liter V6 (332HP/270TQ)
Drivetrain Layout: Front engine/Rear wheel drive
Transmission: 6-speed manual
Seating Capacity: 2 Passengers
EPA Fuel Economy: 18 city/26 highway
Base MSRP $29,990 + $720 (destination charge)
Recommended Options: Sports Package ($3,000)

The Basics
Take whatever you didn’t like about the 350Z, improve on those said items, then chop about 4 inches in length… and voila! All kidding aside, what Nissan did with the 370Z is what exactly what other manufacturers should follow suit.

The 350Z was a good, back-to-the basics, sports car – if not a little raucous. The 370Z is quieter, handles sharper, lighter, more powerful, and oh gawd… huge improvement in interior design and materials!

Highs: Interior design and materials, near top-notch driving dynamics, SyncroRev Match gearbox, fun-at-anytime power delivery
Lows: Coarse engine noise at high speeds, awkward exterior styling, floaty clutch engagement

Exterior (Brendan – 7, Tae – 6)
Basic design architecture is similar to the 350Z, but the 370Z feels like a hodge podge of design studies. Take the 350Z, shorten it by a few inches, slap on the new corporate boomerang headlights and tail lamps, give it a catfish bumper, copy the GT-R roofline, and finally graft a rising beltline from the 240Z for heritage sake. The overall effect is not offensive, but compared to its brother, the Infiniti G37, it leaves a lot to be desired.

Interior (Brendan – 7.5, Tae – 8.5)
Gone are the days of massive, pockmarked, giant piece plastic door panel. From the soft-touch plastics to high quality cloth, the execution of the interior design is spot on. Just one minor complaint – the top of the door panels and dashboard is made of this new textured plastic that resembles painted styrofoam.

Drivetrain (Brendan – 8, Tae – 8.5)
Pretty much a twin brother of the Infiniti G37, except that it feels more refined in the G Coupe. Excellent power from off-idle to redline, but the engine noise becomes a little harsh as the RPMs rise. The addition of SyncroRev Match technology might trick you into thinking that you can take on Takumi Fujiwara in his tofu delivery Panda Hachi Roku (Initial D). Very, very cool piece of technology!

Performance (Brendan – 9, Tae – 9)
It will do 0-60mph in under 5 seconds and a 1/4 mile in the 13 second range. Even just 5 years ago, this is a supercar territory. And, oh yes, this car will more than keep up in the handling department with those supercars of yesterday.

Ride Quality (Brendan – 7.5, Tae – 7.5)
In a car like the 370Z, the point is to feel the road, except that in the 350Z, you felt a little too much of it. The new Z Car’s chassis soaks up most bumps just fine and the steering feels nicely weighted. Compared to the 350Z, the car feels lighter (it actually is lighter by about 100lbs), more nimble, and more solid.

Technology (Brendan – 8, Tae – 9)
Some will argue that the 370Z with the SyncroRev Match technology is the most advanced non automated manual transmission in the world- and we won’t argue against that. The black box below the shifter senses the movement of the shifter and will send a signal to the engine computer to blip the throttle, effectively giving you a virtual heel-and-toe. Perfect for the lazy manual transmission drivers!

Value (Brendan – 9, Tae – 8.5)
The 370Z starts at $30k for the standard model, and tops out at just shy of $47k (convertible with every option). The Z we tested (at $34.5k) is about half the price of a comparably equipped Porsche Cayman S, it’s most direct competitor. This is a very broad segment though, and just about anything with 2 doors and a six-cylinder engine can compete with and will be compared to the Z.

Overall (Brendan – 9.0, Tae – 8.5)
The 370Z will give you one of the most enjoyable driving experience under six-figures. Loads of fun when you want, and just civil enough that you can live with it on a daily basis. Handling is nearly razor-honed, and more than capable. In the ’affordable sports car’ segment, there isn’t car vehicle that combines the power, handling, and value like the 370Z.

-KF

Paul and Todd’s Z Car Comparison (2009 Nissan 370Z) Video Review

Ever since Nissan’s 240Z, the “Z Cars” have been lust-worthy.  And with the introduction of the 370Z, we knew it was worth gathering up the two prior generations and shooting an all-out comparison.

So with a 370Z, a 350Z, and a Twin Turbo 300ZX we headed to some spectacular mountain roads to find which Z is first.  Because great cars aren’t always the newest cars.  And no matter how thin your wallet gets, there’s fun to be had.

Courtesy of our content partner: Everyday Driver TV

Recently we showcased a list of well loved and used cars you can have fun with for $2,500, all while keeping some hard earned money in the bank. This time around, here is a list of appropriate track rats, autocross carvers, and grudge night contenders that will still have life in them, and shiny paint on the hood. Any of these can be used as a reliable daily driver (well, maybe not the 944), and should offer their new owners plenty of service life.

KF E36E36 BMW M3
Best steering rack in the world? Check. Reliable drivetrain? Check. One of the best balanced cars BMW has ever made? Check. Reliably putting out 240HP, and sending the power rearward through a slick shifting transmission, the M3 offers the driver the best of everything. A spartan but well designed interior, a surprisingly comfortable ride, and enough grip to distort your passengers faces. This masterpiece is at home on the track, slicing between cones, or leaving your friends in the dust on your favorite back road. Just look out of electrical issues, coolant system leaks, and cracked rear subframes.

KF BugeyeBugeye Subaru WRX
Thanks to the Gran Turismo video game franchise, the WRX exploded into our country offering cheap performance that knew how to handle corners. Years later, they make cheap track toys, and can be easily modded for some very big power. Older 2.0L flat fours are known for having an on/off switch for a turbo (ie turbo lag), but on what track do you find yourself below 3,000 rpms anyway? So what if they look a little goofy, and scream like a pissed off Wookie at redline? They’ll notchy shift ahead of plenty of “better” cars at a track in the right hands. Do watch out for heavily abused multi owner cars that are run through.

KF C4C4 Chevrolet Corvette
With massive grip and plenty of torque on hand, the C4 is a very capable car. While they aren’t known for having the most accurate steering racks, or the tightest chassis in the world, they dance through corners at very alarming rates of speed. Large clutches, strong transmissions, and nearly bullet proof engines mean this is a car that can be abused, neglected, and still be expected to run. Search hard, and it’s possible to find some low miles, gently driven examples that will put a huge smile on your face every time you drive. Try to stick to the coupes though, as the convertibles flex like a limp noodle.

KF B5B5 Audi S4
The Audi that dethroned the E36 M3 back in the 1990′s, the S4 offers an intoxicating blend of straight line speed, secure AWD handling, and a very well appointed interior. The Quattro drive train does lend itself to resolute understeer, but its forgiving nature makes it an easy car to jump in and explore the limits without getting bitten. Watch out for worn turbos (you were going to do the K04 upgrade anyway weren’t you), abused transmissions from AWD launches, and the gremlins we swear the Germans design into their electronics. Out of the bunch, the S4 is the jack of all trades, and makes a wonderful daily driver.

KF Z32Z32 Nissan 300ZX Turbo
After creating the sales-chart dominating 240Z, Nissan (Datsun) went through most of the late 70′s and the 80′s with sub-par sports cars. Then in 1989, they unleashed the beast with the Z32 300ZX Turbo. Not only you had one of the best designed cars in the world, but the Z could back up the looks with excellent performance. The Z was comfortable on the highway and was a force on the race tracks. Due to the cult following of these cars, finding one in good condition shouldn’t be too difficult. Watch out for examples with front end collision history, the tight engine bay makes for a nightmarish vehicle to repair properly.

KF SN95SN-95 Ford Mustang GT
Still riding on the archaic Fox body platform, the SN-95 still appeals to our inner hooligans. Laying down rubber through the first few gears off a stop light is easy, as are forest fire amounts of smoke when doing donuts. The robust drivetrain just screams abuse me, and who knew doing the worst things to a car could be oh so rewarding. Cheap to mod, these are common sights at local legal and illegal drag races, and are tame enough to be driven to and from the track. Handling numbers won’t always impress, but powersliding out of the corner trailing twin lines of rubber is more fun anyway.

KF EM1EM1 Honda Civic Si
Devouring corners with tenacity, this double wishbone front driver has a playful nature that is not found in modern FWD cars, new Si included. Light accurate steering combined with a brilliant gearbox make this little car a joy to hustle around. With the perfect amount of rotation on corner entry, and an easy ability to meter out power on the exit, the Si rewards the skilled, and helps the hamfisted. Returning great fuel economy, and touting Honda’s reliability, you can scream ‘VTEC just kicked in, yo!’ for hundreds of thousands of miles. Watch out for ricer mods, Pep Boy Intakes, and poorly fitting wire mesh grills and fart can exhausts.

KF 951951 Porsche 944 Turbo
The poor mans Porsche might just be one of the most well behaved of that era. While the non turbos are quite a bit more reliable, reliability and 944 aren’t exactly friends. What the 944 is dear friends with though is a challenging road or track. With enough power to pull itself around quickly, and tight body motions that make changing direction effortless, the 944 is a monster in skilled hands. With none of the quirky pendulum characteristics of the older 911, this is a great Porsche for beginners. Just make sure you have a stone cold reliable daily driver, as this car tends to suffer from plenty of little issues.

KF JZZ30JZZ30 Lexus SC 300
A leap forward in Toyota’s design interpretation, the Lexus SC coupes were so daring that the Japanese customers complained that the car was too futuristic. The ‘bathtub’ second generation SC 430 is the proof of these said complaints. To compliment the boring LS and the ES sedans, Lexus introduced this luxury cruiser in 1992. The Lexus SC 300 can be had with the manual transmission, but finding one can be very hard. This chassis is flexible enough to accept any drivetrain from the JDM Soarer/Aristo’s 2.5 liter twin turbo engine, Supra’s 3.0 liter twin turbo engine, to the newer Toyota/Lexus V8 engines.

KF C170C170 Ford SVT Focus
Someone call down to Hell and see what the temperature is. It’s still hot? That’s odd, because here is a Ford that not only handles well, but trounces most of the competition. Coming out when Ford really turned around their product lineup, this little hatch drove worlds better than any front driver Ford had ever made, and better than almost all of the rivals. Matching a strong engine to a close ratio 6 speed making straight line runs fun, but flying into turns way too hot, sliding to slow down, and powering out is where the real entertainment is at. Plus, it’s cost effective and well designed rear suspension make bumpy sections of track a non issue.

Honorable Mentions:

E38 BMW 740i
What? Tuner car? Come again! With the extremely low purchase price, the VIP tuning scene has been growing steadily. Picking up a clean E38 should be easy to accomplish well under this price cap, and leave you some money in the bank for mods. What’s common? On top of a full detail, lowering it to an almost undriveable height, exhaust, a full host of in car entertainment, and a nice upgrade from the stock wheels. While you wont see many of these barges carving along back roads, they’re becoming a lot more common sight at car shows. Just remember, it was a very expensive car when it was new, and it still costs your first born to maintain.

Y33 Inifinti Q45
Keeping in theme with VIP (‘bippu’ in Japanese) tuning, no VIP tuning talk can be complete without having this Q-ship in the discussion. Even though the Infiniti Q45 always played ‘the other Japanese luxury car’ role, when it comes to VIP, the Lexus LS takes the back seat. Because Q45′s ‘statesman’ styling and the low resale value, the Q45 is the VIP tuning crowd’s favorite.

Z16A Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4
Two turbos, AWD, and more gadgets and gizmos than the Apollo Program. These porkers might not love corners as much as a Z32, but are surprisingly fun to drive hard. With more than 300 horsepower on tap, it’s easy to get into trouble quickly if you’re used to driving a commuter car. As a rolling testament to technological excess, these can be a nightmare to maintain, but can be ever so rewarding when working correctly.

-KF

The US has always been an interesting market for auto makers to tackle. Many of them would create seeming hit models only to fall flat in the end. Take for example the mid 90′s BMW 3 Series. The car was a success both in Europe and the US, so naturally BMW decided to add the hatch back version to the US line-up thinking that it would share the same success it saw in Europe. Unfortunately, sales were less than impressive so the 3 Series hatch never saw US soil again. Both foreign and domestic automakers have always been reluctant to bring models they have in other countries to the US. Weather it be the restraints of emission and safety regulations or hatchback-phobia, the US has missed out on some absolutely brilliant cars that have been the desire of car fans across the country. In no particular order, here are 10 of the models that touched our hearts but never touched our home soil (well, not officially).

2003 BMW M3 CSL (E46)
bmw-m3-cslCoupe, Sport, Light. With even the slightest mention of these words near any BMW fan in the US, they’ll start drooling and panting uncontrollably. Shortly after they will pull every last hair on their head, fall to their knees and in a mad fit of rage and confusion, scream to the car gods, “WHY?! WHY NOT HERE?” OK, not exactly, but that is the equivalent emotion felt by avid BMW fans who long for this car. It was more powerful, louder, lighter, lower, stiffer, grippier, and above all, more fun than the already popular M3. Visually the car had subtle additions like the carbon fiber roof, a bumper mounted intake, a more aerodynamically sculpted trunk, and bigger, lighter wheels. Underneath the hood was a different story. What BMW did to the 3 Series to make the M3 is the same thing they did to make the M3 CSL from the M3 (So would this be the M-M3?). It’s performance increase over the M3 is significant and quantifiable but utterly irrelevant. Tiff Needell of Brittan’s 5th Gear TV show once screamed, “I don’t care if it is faster! I just sounds faster!” as he plowed up through the gears. This car brought back the true spirit of “M.” Initially the M3 CSL had no radio, no AC, no leather, and was only available in SMG (which did perform better on the track). Comfort and convenience went out the window and performance was the sole focus, a feat last seen only in the first ever M3 (E30). Why the US never saw this masterpiece is beyond me. If BMW managed to get the M3 CSL here legally, it would have instantly sold out.

1999-2002 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec (R34)
nissan-skyline-gtr-r34-blueOK so we finally have the GT-R here, but we never saw this one. This was the first of the Skylines to really jump off the technological deep end. It was the first real-life video game. Like the Nissan GT-R we now have, this car could make even the most appalling drivers look like pros. Whatever mistake you made, the committee of on-board computers would make appropriate corrections by diverting power funds to the proper locations. This car could read your mind. Whatever you were trying to do, it somehow knew what  you wanted and gave you more. Couple that to its estimated 350BHP turbocharged 2.6L in-line six and you had a car that was almost unstoppable.  All of the advantages of front, rear and all-wheel drive were present with few of the disadvantages. As if this wasn’t enough, Nissan made the V-Spec Nur variant, which improved the already fantastic suspension and engine. In 2007, our prayer was finally answered. The successor to the R34 Skyline, the Nissan GT-R (R35) arrived in US showrooms and quickly sold out for more than MSRP. Just don’t try to import an R34, even through Florida; it just may end up crushed into tin cans when the Fed’s find out, and that my car enthusiast friends, is a crime against humanity.

1997-2000 and 2001-2005 Honda Civic Type R (EP and EK)
civic-typer-epThe Type R badge is the rice rocket wet dream. Honda had great success with the Integra Type R in the US.  Before the great crash of the auto industry, a used Integra Type R in good condition would cost you well over $20,000. However, no other Type R made it to the US. Hatchback-phobia again is the problem with the Civic Type R. Critics hailed this souped-up city runabout as the typical high revving torqueless go-cart we’ve all come to expect from Honda. Although the newer EP’s suspension was less advanced as its predecessors double wishbone, it handled as well as the best of its competition.

honda-civic-type-r-ek9The US did get the hatchback Civic Si, an anemic version of the Civic Type R, but it was not nearly as successful as its sedan predecessor, which played a large roll in Honda’s decision not to introduce the Type R in the US. Like the BMW M3 CSL, the Type R does not simply represent higher performance numbers. It represents a huge worldwide following which some have dubbed a religion. Other cars that received the Type R treatment include the Accord and NSX. The removal of sound insulation and the addition of under-body aero lead the NSX Type R to nearly tie the Ferrari 360 Challenge Stradale’s lap time of the Nürburgring Nordschleife. Do not despair for there is good news for the Civic Type R in the US! A Type R sedan had been released in Japan with speculation that it might come Stateside. We’ll keep you posted.

1991-1993 Lancia Delta Integrale
800px-lancia_delta_integrale_evo_2_img_9403Considered to be the world’s ultimate hot hatch, the Lancia Delta Integrale first hit Europe’s streets in1991. Many things we consider as ordinary features on most cars today were standard on this high performance model Delta. It had a 2.0L turbo four that churned 215HP and came with an advanced torsion AWD unit capable of sending power as need to wheels that had more traction with a distribution of almost 50:50 front to rear, perfect for lurid slides in the dirt. But the engine and drive train were relatively unchanged from it’s lesser Turbo HF leaving the only difference to the suspension.  The Delta Integrale was wider and stiffer giving it better performance on and off road. (Yes I did say off road) It’s most distinguishing feature are the rally inspired light weight wheels and aggressive body kit resembling it’s rally counterpart.  In 1993, computers were added to the cars brain which gave it variable ignition timing, less intrusive emission control, idle control (VW MkII fans will appreciate this), and boost control which reduced turbo lag. Emission laws again spoil our fun in the US and that inexplicable fear of hatches. However, look closely and you’ll find a few gray market imports lurking about. I spotted a black one in San Mateo, California just a few blocks from downtown.

1998 Subaru Imprezza 22B STi/WRX STi Type R
1998_subaru_impreza_22b_sti-2The Imprezza 22B sold out just after it went on sale. It was in such high demand that it was rumored even the late Colin McRae had to pay for his.  For those of you who are unfamiliar with this beast, Subaru decided to celebrate their 40th birthday and dominant 3rd title of World Rally Championship by making the 22B. Their driver, Colin McRae, was largely responsible for their success that year. Subaru claimed their car made 276BHP, the mandated limit for cars sold in Japan, but many have spun the dyno rollers at a higher number.  Although it was based on the Imprezza chassis, the 22B was noticeably wider and was equipped with road clawing suspension, eye-popping brakes and a more aggressive AWD setup.  The WRX Coupe R the common man’s 22B.  It lacked the wide body and power but had equally aggressive suspension and had a detuned version of the 22B’s engine. Both cars had enough power to hurl themselves up against their top-gear rev limiter thanks to the short ratio differential. This made it the perfect weekend track warrior. Emission laws barred these mischievous siblings from the US.

2002-2003 Ford Focus RS
ford_focus_rs_frontThe biggest criticism of American cars is the notion that they are undesirable. Well, here’s a very desirable one. Meet the Ford Focus RS. It’s a more powerful, more nimble Focus.  Ford’s European design division came up with the internationally successful Focus and consequently entered it into WRC competition which was also driven by Colin McRae. Their tribute car came in the form of the Focus RS. Though not a huge departure from the standard Focus, the first RS was equipped with a 2.0L turbo four producing a modest 205 HP. Earlier this year, the second generation Focus RS hit European showrooms with a whopping 300+HP turbocharged five-cylinder from Volvo. The first generation Focus RS would have been a patriotic and unique alternative to the Japanese Evo’s and STI’s. More importantly it might have helped put the US automaker back on the map at home.

1957-1975 Fiat Abarth 600/695/850
header_89675No, the year range is not a typo. This is one of Italy’s most quintessential cars. Its style and superior performance was everything that was Italian all in a compact aluminium shell with wheels. In Italy during the 60′s a gorgeous woman could be called “Abarthizzata.” Other than working it’s way into modern Italian vocabulary, the Abarth’s racing counterparts were successful in their classes which included touring cars. Early versions put out only a mere 27BHP while the later 850SS models were rated a almost 100BHP and were capable of reaching speeds close to 120MPH. Fiat has revived this model in Europe and has specifically announced its plans to bring the car to America. With its purchase of Chrysler, Fiat has perfect distribution method for the 500 Abarth. Just as BMW did with Mini, Fiat will sell the 500 through Chrysler dealerships.

1986-1989 Porsche 959
959-3We have yet another car inspired by rally racing; this one is from the Group B era. For those who don’t know, Group B era ended because the cars were too fast and too dangerous. So, Porsche decided to make a production version of the car that was too dangerous for racing drivers. This monstrosity gave new meaning to the word ridiculous. Remember, this car showed up in the mid 80′s and could time warp you to 60MPH in 3.7 seconds and to the quarter mile in 11.8 seconds.  These figures were pure insanity in the 80′s. The only car to out accelerate the 959 was the famed McLaren F1, which showed up in the 90′s. Speed wasn’t the only thing it had. Style, reliability and handling were in equal abundance.  The Porsche-Steuer Kupplung (PSK) AWD unit, the most advanced of its time, could direct 80% of available power to the rear when needed, the shocks could be adjusted electronically to various comfort and sport settings, it’s aerodynamics produced no lift which made it drivable at its top speed of almost 200MPH, and it sported super light weight magnesium alloy wheels which burn a blinding white when lit on fire. Porsche refused to send the US Department of Transportation the four 959s required for crash testing, so the car was never brought here by Porsche. However, since the “Show and Display” law, the car now meets crash test standards and can be fitted with emissions equipment to make the car legal in the US.

1983-1991 Audi Sport Quattro
97_audi_sport_quattro_1985_01_bThis is the great grandmother of all of Audi’s AWD cars. The Audi Sport Quattro housed the same AWD unit used in Audi’s legendary Group B rally car and has been handed down to all of Audi’s cars. Quattro is the pride of all Audi fans and it was the reason of the car’s dominance in Group B. The rally version eventually made well over 500BHP and is still one of the most powerful rally cars ever built. The production version made a modest 305BHP from a 2.1L in-line five. Even 17 years later, the Audi Sport Quattro could up keep up with the far more advanced Mitsubishi Lance Evolution VI. Only 224 were ever made and none were sent to the US, although gray market cars have been spotted. Emission laws again prove to be a thorn in the side of many automakers attempting to bring cars into the US.

1990-1994 Nissan Pulsar GTi-R
nissan_pulsar_gti-r_1Yet another feather-weight rally inspired hot hatch that never saw the Red, White, and Blue. This car is like a baby Skyline GT-R. It had similar AWD unit and an exclusive turbo-charged engine with 2 less cylinders and 1 liter less displacement. Other goodies included a snazzy body kit, sporty suspension, and big brakes. This car was available in left hand drive but only made it as far as UK in its westward travels. It was very quick for its day and had a matching chassis making a great competitor to the Subaru WRX and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, but in a smaller, cuter package.

-KF

How does one sum up the best race cars? Due to the nature of racing, if one car dominates, other teams scramble to make something better. Nobody likes playing second fiddle (well, maybe the Arrows F1 team does), and success in racing usually generates a wake of qualified contenders just outside your draft. Sometimes a very talented driver can bring a lackluster car home consistently, and pad the wins.

Rather than just run down the list of total number of wins vs. entries, and make the list clinical and bland, we have complied a list of cars that we feel stand out among the crowd. It can be ground breaking performance, insane looks, or a huge leap forward in technology, but here in no particular order is KarFarm’s Top 10:

nissanskylinegtrNissan Skyline GT-R (R32) – It earned the nickname of ‘Godzilla’. An offspring of a concept car called MID-4, the Nissan Skyline GT-R production mirrored the Porsche 959 – except for the engine placement. In street form the car was nearly unbeatable. But in race form the GT-R was unbeatable, literally. It won all 29 races in the JTCC (Japan Touring Car Championships) from 1989-1993 and won the series title every year during that time. From 1991-1997, the car was undefeated in the N1 series in all 50 races. The car was so dominant in racing that the GT-R was given it’s own racing series, now known as (JGTC) Japan GT Car Series. Not only did the ‘Godzilla’ dominate the Japanese home market, but it killed the competition at the Nurburgring, the UK, and Australian racing circuits. In fact, the rumor is that the GT-R was squeezed out of the Australian race circuit.

autouniontypedAuto Union Type D – Born before Europe broke out in conflict yet again, the Type D was a fantastic improvement over the Type C. With new rules limiting engine size, the total output of the engine went down, but improvements in the suspension and the chassis slightly tamed the monster that was the Type C. In the era of high horsepower, low grip, and knife in the back handling, the Type D was a valiant effort by the company that went on to become Audi. Driven to success by Tazio Nuvolari after the tragic death of Bernd Rosemeyer, and through various team upsets, the Type D represented what a team could accomplish when they were blood thirsty to win. Hard to master, but incredibly fast, this mid engined car set lap records that were in place long after the cars disappeared behind the Iron Curtain after WWII.

audi-quattroAudi Sport Quattro – This monster was created to smash all contenders in the short lived Group B Rally. Driven hard by Walter Röhrl before the FIA took the axe to the overpowered and accident prone Group B cars, this car literally dominated the rally scene for the few shorts years it was allowed to. It took a few years for other manufactures to emulate Audi, as RWD not AWD was the norm at the time. Being able to reliably put down the close to 600 HP the later versions produced made this one hard car to catch, even with the tough competition.

porsche917kPorsche 917K – Before modern times of anti-stall, traction control, and computer controlled everything, the 917K delivered a well earned first win at the 24 hours of Le Mans to Porsche. After a disappointing showing by the unstable 917 in 1969, the car was modified with a shorter tail to produce downforce instead of lift. Having finally solved the stability issues, the 917 went on to set the standard for the series. Setting total distance records that stand in modern times at 3,107.7 on the Circuit de la Sarthe, this was a car to be feared at the track. While later versions had more power, and even went faster down the Mulsanne Straight, the 917K was the first version to make the competition shake in their driving suits.

mcmerc-mp4-13McLaren-Mercedes MP4/13 – In an attempt to slow the cars down further, the FIA mandated grooved tires in the 1998 F1 season. Fighting for traction, the new tires were not well liked, caused an immense amount of frustration, but one team had the car to best adapt. Edging out the genetic mutant that we call Shuey, Mika Häkkinen earned the Drivers Championship, while McLaren-Mercedes easily won the Constructors Championship. Fighting off a frustrated Ferrari, the MP4/13 was questioned and reviewed for it’s different braking system, and it was found out that it was using the brakes similar to a modern hybrid. Converting kinetic energy to electrical energy stored in batteries, the MP4/13 could give itself a close to 40HP boost for a limited time. This long wheel base McLaren had a few teething problems, but was a huge advance for McLaren’s record in the 1990′s.

merc300slMercerdes 300SL W194 – Nicknamed the ‘Gull Wing’, this was the first car to use direct fuel injection into its 6 cylinders, although the race version was carburated. The race version of the same vehicle, to the tune of approximately 230hp, won numerous overall victories at the 24 hour of Le Mans endurance race, and recorded 2nd and 4th place finishes in its first race, the Mille Miglia in Italy. The ‘Gull Wing’ was so well designed that ex-factory Mercedes racing driver John Fitch drove it in an attempt to set a land speed record at the Bonneville Salt Flats in 2005. It was also recently voted as ‘the Car of the Century’.

fordsierracosworthFord Sierra Cosworth – From BTCC, DTM, Group N Rally, to a host of others, this little hatch took on the world. Inspired off a rather uninspiring small car, the project of Stuart Turner looked to exploit this little RWD car and imprint Ford’s name back into racing. By adding a aircraft carrier sized dual-rear wing, the lift generated by the hatchback was negated, and instead pushed the rear wheels to the ground at speed. Short wheelbase, high HP, and plenty of venues in which to compete, 1980′s race tracks were crammed with these cars. The rules required the car to be homologated, and soon tarted up Sierras were seen across Europe.

fordgt40Ford GT40 – Built at the request of an enraged Henry Ford II, the GT40 teethed for a little before dominating at Le Mans. Ford was upset due to a failed acquisition of Ferrari, and shot Enzo between the eyes by building a better racecar than the men from Modena could muster. Destroying the competition in 1966, the GT40′s scored a 1-2-3 finish, proving their Lola sourced chassis and 427ci engine was a force to be reckoned with. Combining great looks, immense power, and handling poise, the GT40 was the perfect slap in the face Ferrari deserved. Thousands of replicas later, and remade by Ford in 2003, the GT40 can turn heads on the road or track to this day.

jaguardtypeJaguar D-Type – Borrowing a ton of technology from aircraft industry, the D-Type took full advantage of Malcolm Sayer’s aerodynamic expertise. Combining disk brakes (first seen on the C-Type predecessor), a monocoque chassis, fuel bladders and a wind tunnel tested design, Jaguar was attacking Le Mans for all it was worth. Down on power against the Ferraris, the D-Type used it’s slippery shape and fantastic brakes to edge forward. While the factory cars always seemed to be plagued by misfortune, the simplicity of the D-Type ensured that many private entries were around to take up the slack. An impressive racing history combined with an advanced yet simple chassis, the D-Type was the car to beat for many years in the 1950′s.

lotusford72Lotus-Ford 72 – The forefather to the F1 cars of today. A ground breaking shape that was emulated quickly, the 72 surged ahead of the pack, and revolutionized the F1 world. Inboard brakes to save unsprung weight, sidepod mounted radiators, and exotic (if quirky) suspension allowed this Ford powered car to set a blistering pace. Accomplished as being one of the most recognizable of the 1970′s F1 cars, this wedge went on to run in almost 6 complete seasons before a worthy replacement was introduced. Either in the Gold Leaf livery, or Black on Gold, the John Player Special 72′s went on to score many wins, and raised the bar for what made an F1 car competitive. The top mounted airbox that gives the engine the benefit of ram air was introduced on the 72, and quickly became the standard in F1.

Honorable Mentions
datsunbre240zDatsun Z/ZX
– The 240Z was originally named ‘Fairlady Z’, after the Broadway’s ‘My Fairlady’ play. But at the race track, there was nothing lady about the Z. It is probably the most decorated car in SCCA history. The Z won from 1970-1979 and 1984 in the production C class, and for a good measure the same car won again in 1986 in the GT2 class (by the son of a driver of one of the original Z’s). It was also piloted by some of the most famous American drivers such as Johnny Morton, Paul Newman, and Steve Millen (of Stillen).

audi-r10-tdiAudi R10 – A revolution in endurance racing, the Audi R10 TDI was the first truly successful diesel vehicle to compete.  Released as a concept in 2005 with a  5.5 liter twin-turbo V-12 diesel, the R10 won  both the 12 hours of Sebring and the 24 hours of Le Mans in its first full race season. Between 2006 and 2008, the R10 racked up 3 consecutive 24 hours of Le Mans victories in the LMP1 category and overall. Not only did it win 3 years in a row but the R10 also took over the podium with many 1-2 finishes, leaving other manufacturers like Peugeot to dream about the victory. Case in point, in the 2008 Le Mans, after a rare mechanical problem, the Audi  fell a good 45 minutes behind the Peugeot 908, only to come back to win by a margin of 4 minutes in the late stages of the race. The dominant force in endurance racing since its inception, it is being used as the base for its replacement, the 2009 Audi R15 racecar.

suzukiescudoSuzuki Escudo – Anyone who has played Gran Turismo 2 or 3 knows this baby. With a 2.0L V6 cranking out an astonishing 985HP, this boosted beast was made for one purpose: climb Pikes Peak. While the newer XL7 may hold the current climb record, you’d be hard pressed to ask a car enthusiast what an Escudo is without them bringing up this horrifying car. With the wing area that rivals most small aircraft, more power than an F1 car, and a purpose built mid engine, AWD chassis, this car really took full advantage of the “Unlimited Class” in the Race to the Clouds.

-KF

(photos: flickr)

In a recent article, “The Misconception of the Car Club“, I discussed the public view of the automotive community.
I mentioned that club gatherings start as a car meet, but eventually grow into family get-togethers. Well, this past weekend I had the fortune of attending Freakmont X, an annual Nissan/Datsun/Infiniti meet in California held by Team Driven. Held at LeMans Karting in Fremont, this meet is the largest Nissan gathering in California. Intended as a grassroots event, it involved a photoshoot, a barbeque, some go-karting, and enjoying each other’s company.

One important thing to note about Freakmont, is that it has a zero-tolerance policy for stupidity and disruptive behavior. Created as a family event, safety is paramount. Many people, in fact bring their children, spouses, and even pets to the event to share the passion with their loved ones. Participants are given a disclaimer before attending the event stating that any act of showboating, loud disruptive behavior, or anything that could endanger the safety of those attending or even the outside public would result in being asked to leave, or possibly even being escorted out by the local police department. Essentially, the point of this event is for friends to gather, and to prove to the public that car enthusiasts and car clubs are not a menace to society. Aside from one accident at Freakmont VIII, the event has had absolutely no issues or confrontations with the law in its 10 year history. In fact, the event has received praise from the city of Fremont for the organization and effort put into it.

Shockingly,the usually large 300zx community did not have a strong showing. Members from  ZONC (Z Owners of Northern California) brought twenty-some Nissan 350z, 370z, Infiniti G35 and G37 models. Norcal240, which came early to help set up the event space, represented the drifting community with about 20 240sx’s. Also, a nice collection of Nissan Sentra and Infiniti G20s represented the sportscompact segment. 5 or so oldschool Datsun 510 racecars were present with swapped motors and gutted interiors. Finally, a rare gem of a Nissan Skyline GTR R33 V-Spec owned by the CEO of PhotoShootMyCar.com as well as a brand new Nissan R35 GTR were on site. Forums aside, many regional tuners like San Bruno’s The Shop, San Jose’s Z Car Garage, and Sacramento’s Driven Authority came to support the local club scene with raffle prizes and other services.

Once the majority of people arrived, the attendees huddled around the barbeque waiting for burgers and hot dogs. To further enhance the family atmosphere, Team Driven asked forum members to “register”, in order to get an idea of how many would attend. Every person who registered brought something to share with the others, like a true potluck. Afterwords, many members walked over to the go-karting track for some friendly competition, food in hand. Walking around to the various groups of friends at the event, some tinkered on their vehicles with each other’s help, others watched go-karters battle it out or just chatted about all things automotive and non. A few of members then decided to set off on a cruise to a spot nearby at Lake Elizabeth for photos and fresh air, while some others planned to continue the day by going to someones home for gaming and movies.

Around 5pm, people began cleaning up, ready to leave satisfied from a day out with friends and family. Shop banners and Nissan logos were wrapped up once again, awaiting their next appearance at Freakmont XI. Business cards, forum advertisements, and phone numbers were exchanged. For many, the event was their first time putting a face to a name. For others, the day was just another in a long list of family barbeques. In either case, Freakmont both built and strengthened personal bonds, as well as kept the enthusiast community alive.

-KF

It’s time for another Rank list.  Some vehicles are just milestones that symbolize a certain decade. Our first Rank article will delve into the 1990′s. This decade is defined by the following items – The Simpsons first aired, Beavis and Butthead were a huge hit, parachute pants, big bang hair, sweet mullets, and hip-hop music became mainstream. The criteria of this list are that they had to be introduced and sold in the U.S. market between 1990-1999.

saturnsc2Saturn SL/SC – An upstart company, in the mid-80′s, had a vision of affordable cars with customer service that rivaled luxury brands. GM incubated this new startup carmaker, and when they couldn’t sustain itself, GM took over the operation. By creating cheap (if not mediocre) cars with no haggle pricing and great customer service, Saturn hit a home run. While the brand is dead today, there is no debate that these inexpensive cars with their plastic dent resistant panels represented a huge leap forward from GM. It’s not uncommon for these little guys to run abused past the 200k mile mark, and keep on chugging, proving that America can do cheap and reliable, just like their rivals from across the Pacific.

98lexusls400Lexus LS 400 – Toyota took a cue from Honda, who created the Acura brand to market its upper class vehicles. The formula was simple: take what the Germans do best, and shove it back in their smug faces. Who thought a brand known for making fun little tin cans could whip up a hyper luxury car that could offer more than an S-Class or 7 Series? They did that and more, all while undercutting their price point. Known for stone cold reliability (something that began to elude the Germans in the 90′s), it’s common to see neglected LS 400′s still running around, hundreds of thousands of miles behind their bald tires. It’s a fair bet to make that there is still some money left in their owners’ wallets.

boxster_07Porsche Boxster – The Boxster was the car that Porsche has been wanting to create for 30 years. It’s no secret that Porsche’s been trying to replace the fabled 911 for about 30+ years, with cars like 924, 928, and 944. They wanted to remain loyal to their purists, but needed to branch out and diversify their lineup. Offering awesome handling, precision steering, adequate power, and a open-top motoring experience, the Boxster was a hit. It was actually such an immense hit that Porsche actually decided to make all their cars resemble the looks of the Boxster (see the 996 and Cayenne). Without the Boxster, Porsche as we know would not exist today. The Boxster took a car company that was getting stale and perceived as a one-horse wonder, and made them relevant again.

1996fordexplorerFord Explorer – While some kids might have been attacked by a T-Rex in one, this was the favorite kid hauler of the 1990′s. Too old to want a wagon, too hip to drive a mini van, Americans turned to the SUV. With promises about adventures off roading and camping, Ford sold more Explorers than expected. Sadly though, most of these lived only on paved roads, with the occasional dirt parking lot at a Spice Girls concert. In the 1990′s, if you were the hip Dad rocking out to Candlebox on the way to preschool, chances are you were driving an Explorer XLT or Eddie Bauer.  Don’t let the Firestone debacle scare you (*cough cough bad drivers*), these were excellent trucks.

gmev1GM (Saturn) EV1 – The second Saturn vehicle on this list; strange ain’t it? The all-electric EV1 could be the car that started the downfall of GM. The Saturn EV1 showcased the American ingenuity and forward thinking. GM correctly marketed this vehicle as a Saturn, because in 1996, the Saturn brand was a ‘forward thinking’ company. Since the EV1 only could be leased, and not purchased, the demand was artificially deflated. The cancellation of the EV1 program is also highly controversial. The conspiracy theorists state that the GM brass decided they couldn’t profit from servicing these vehicles (no oil changes or tune-ups), basing their information from typical dealership service department hearsay. The arrogance and the greed of GM and its dealers killed the EV1. Soon after the death of EV1, the Prius took over as the halo ‘green car’ while GM was rolling in cash from selling SUVs and trucks.

c5corvetteChevrolet Corvette (C5) – GM might have shot the interior out of a plastic shotgun full of various borrowed parts, but under all of the plastic, cheap leather and balsa wood is where this Corvette trounced all others behind it. With an obtainable entry price, unending power and torque from the LS1, and a T-56 transaxle to route the power, the C5 had the go fast bits ready. What really set this apart though, was the hydroformed chassis, which was an elegant solution to the complex frame design. No longer did the interior make noise like crickets finding each other in a hurricane, and no longer did your chassis flex your contact patch away mid corner. Predictable and high limit handling, with plenty of acceleration, you had to spend a lot more money back in the 1990′s to beat the C5′s performance in any regard.

vwnewbeetleVW New Beetle – The public as a whole buys cars on looks (well, Ramblers did sell…), and there is no smarter way to pack your showrooms than remake a car everyone loved. Since almost everyone has a fond story of a Beetle, it only made sense to fill showrooms with people who want to have another cute mobile. Whether or not the 2.slow engine was a boat anchor, or the interior had an aircraft carrier sized dashboard, this car simply made people smile, and remember their beloved cars of the past. Did you hear the last part Ford and Chrysler? That’s right, the formula is proven, people like retro cars, so feel free to make all the PT Cruisers and Mustang GT’s you want, with some retro Camaros and Challengers in there for good measure.

99vwjettaVW Jetta/Golf - These cars allowed journalists the ability to combine the term dash stroker and frugal in the same sentence. For years, fully grown men realize they have made it in life when the pure act of sitting inside their Lexus, BMW, Audi or Mercedes is just as fun as driving it. The quality of materials, the softness of the materials, the seamless stitching, and the plush headliners all add up to a tactile overload that shows the world you cashed in your Corolla, and now you commute with style! Well, along came the MkIV, and it threw a wrench the size and shape of a big yellow couch into the works. All of a sudden every kid with a cosigner could lease one, and extol the virtues of soft touch plastics to their lesser brethren just like their dear old dad can with his Bimmer. What this did for everyone else is set the standard high for what is expected out of a commuter, and dash strokers around the world rejoiced, as it’s pretty hard now to find a commuter car without a nice interior. Suddenly the economy car wasn’t the penalty box it used to be.

1990-96-nissan-300zxNissan 300ZX Turbo (Z32) – Before the 1990 300ZX Turbo, Japanese sports cars were considered second class citizens. This Z car though, was low slung, wide, powerful, featured timeless design, and made a huge statement. It not only revitalized the Z fan-base, but it attracted a whole new clientele. Even people who didn’t necessarily like Japanese cars were inclined to give the Nissan at least a look or two. The Z had a twin turbo engine and a 4-wheel steering system, the two features that the Japanese rivals copied – the 3000GT, Supra Turbo, RX-7. Even GM felt the kick in the ass to make the next Corvette (C5) better, and the ‘Super GT’ class was born.

4a1BMW 540i (E39) – While we wanted to cheat and put the M5 in here, and against the fact that it was delivered in the states in late 1999, the M5 truly is a 2000 model year. What spawned this monster of a car, with 400hp, a manual transmission, and an interior even a MkIV owner would drool on? It’s little brother, the 540i. The horsepower war in the family sedan segment had seemed to have stalled out in the late 1990′s, as BMW and Mercedes waited for one another to show their hand for their next ‘Bahn Stormer. In the mean time, nothing defined the perfect daily driver like a high HP, RWD, manual transmission BMW. Back when the looks were elegant and understated, when the interiors were not blistered with i-Drive humps, you could get a 155mph family hauler that was just at home in your daily commute as it was pounding your favorite back roads. Executives all over the world love their toys, and leasing a 540 in the 1990′s while your M5 was on order was the smartest way to keep your wife happy with a family hauler, while having all the fun you wanted on the side.

Honorable Mention
Not quite the Top 10… but these vehicles were quite significant for the decade and/or its company.

1996hyundaitiburonHyundai Tiburon – Even after the introduction of the Tiburon in 1996, the general public thought of Hyundai as a cheap, junky cars. The boys in Seoul decided to make a stronger presence in the world. The only way to get any respect was to up its quality. Good thing, since the Mitsubishi owned Hyundai was finally able to stand on its own. The Tiburon replaced the Scoupe (which had a good track record of racing), and slowly reversed its shoddy image. They soon introduced the 10-year warranty, the third generation Sonata, and even Consumer Reports reliability ranking caught up to Honda’s level. The Tiburon was Hyundai’s halo car before the Genesis, and it signified the start of Hyundai’s 10+ year meteoric rise.

1995maximaNissan Maxima (A32) - The car itself wasn’t spectacular in any sense. It could be argued that this generation of Maxima almost made Nissan bankrupt. But this car is on the list for one thing, this stale-looking Japanese mid-size car can hit 0-60 in 6.5 seconds, all thanks to its engine. The mighty VQ30DE engine might be the most important engine in the last two decades. This V6 engine was developed for the German Touring Car Championship racing circuit, and was dropped into the American market Maxima. The race engine was super smooth, powerful, and extraordinarily light. Until the VQ30DE, the general thought was that the inline-6 engines were the way to go for smoothness and power (BMW and Toyota). Not only this engine made the list of many automotive publications’ top engine list, but found its way to just about every Nissan/Infiniti vehicle on the market today. It’s taken nearly two decades for the other manufacturers to catch up to the VQ.

hummerh1AMG Hummer – Ever thought what it would be like to build a suspension from bridge girders, fire Stinger missiles from your roof, or lead an attack through the desert, all while getting 8mpg? If this was your fantasy back in the 90′s, this was the truck of choice. With the ability to maul unpaved roads like a Cougar at ladies night, nothing short of narrow trails stopped the H1. Loved by our favorite Terminator, hated now by anyone who hugs baby seals and loves mother earth, the H1 was a way to make a statement that you were a pure, unadulterated, bad ass. While it wasn’t quite 12 yards long, or two lanes wide, it was close to 65 tons of American Pride.

-KF