I’m not trying to pick on Nissan, but here’s something interesting: In July, 2010, sales of the very large Nissan Armada SUV above were up 311.4%. Sales of the Xterra SUV were up 56.6%. On the flip side, sales of the subcompact Nissan Cube were down 54%. Sales of the equally subcompact Nissan Versa were down 9.4%. This isn’t meant to bash SUVs—I’m not an SUV hater—it’s meant to show that in July, 2010, sales of large vehicles were up, and sales of small cars were down, and not just at Nissan.

It’s been said Americans have short memories. This could certainly be said for car buying trends, at least with regards to vehicle size and fuel efficacy. Gas prices have held relatively steady over the last year—the average price is still under $3.00 a gallon, although on the rise—and Americans have decided to buy larger, thirstier cars again. At least that’s what July’s sales data suggest.

July was a good month for the majority of automakers offering vehicles in the States. However, it was the bigger vehicles leading the charge, even though there’s more small cars on the market than in recent history. Autoblog, for example, reported Honda’s Civic was down 25.5% while the Pilot was up 45.4% (the Fit was down 29.5%). Nissan’s car division was down 3.7%, but its trucks went up 51%. As I reported on Tuesday, all b-segment cars on the U.S. market (sans the Kia Rio and Kia Soul; +99.7% and +65.9%, respectively) experienced a drop in sales compared to this time in 2009.

It’s not like Americans don’t have small options these days, it’s quite the contrary. There are more small car choices these days than since the 1980s, and they’re almost undoubtedly the best small cars ever to grace American soil. Even with the not-so-stellar economy, gas prices that still aren’t “cheap,” and many great smaller options, the slow sales of small cars says something about U.S. consumers: They like big vehicles and fuel economy isn’t as important as many want to think.

How soon people forget. Remember when gas prices approached $5.00 a gallon in places? It wasn’t very long ago. Remember saving money by driving a car that got 25 MPG vs. 15? Of course a subcompact, compact, or even a “car” doesn’t fit everyone’s bill. But, they likely fit more lifestyles then many people would want to believe. It’s the “bigger is better” mentality.

Hey, I’m the last person on Earth that’s going to tell someone what they have to buy. Some people need pickups, SUVs, and minivans (most “minivans” aren’t very “mini” anymore if you haven’t noticed), and you do have the freedom to buy whatever the hell you want—that’s fine. But I’d bet gas prices will rise again and used car lots will once again be strewn with copious amounts of large, gas-guzzling vehicles. I just figure it’s a matter of if not when.

Clearly, Americans decided to buy big with their vehicle purchases—at least in July—despite the influx of great small vehicles. But is this spike in bigger vehicle sales simply a blip on the radar, or is this a return to buying bigger and less fuel-efficient again? Assuming gas prices stay around where they are, the next few months should be good indicators.

Courtesy of our content partner – Subcompact Culture


Where was I the last couple of days? I was at the Northwest Automotive Press Association’s (NWAPA) “Run to the Sun.” This annual driving event brings a number of new cars and NWAPA members together for a multi-day driving extravaganza.

The field featured a variety of cars from various segments from entry level to ultra luxury. The list looked like this:

- 2010 Acura TL SH-AWD Tech
- 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
- 2010 Chevrolet Corvette GS Convertible
- 2010 Dodge Challenger R/T
- 2010 Viper SRT10 Coupe
- 2011 Ford Mustang GT Premium
- 2011 Honda CR-Z EX w/Navigation
- 2011 Hyundai Sonata GLS
- 2011 Infiniti M37X AWD
- 2010 Jaguar XFR
- 2010 Jaguar XKR Convertible
- 2010 Kia Forte Koup SX
- 2010 Lexus IS350 Convertible (w/F-Sport parts)


- 2010 Lotus Evora
- 2010 Mazdaspeed3
- 2011 Mercedes-Benz E550 Cabriolet
- 2011 Mercedes SLS AMG
- 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback Ralliart
- Mitsubishi iMiEV
- 2010 Nissan Z Roadster
- 2011 Subaru Impreza WRX STI
- Suzuki Kizashi Turbo Concept
- 2011 Volvo C70 T5 Convertible
- 2010 Volkswagen Jetta TDI Cup Edition

Over the course of three days, I got to drive each one of these cars on some great roads in northwestern Washington. There were a number of remarkable cars. Here are just a couple that really stood out:

Favorite Overall Car: 2011 Ford Mustang GT
Why: I’m a long-time Mustang fan, and the ’11 GT is the total package. They’ve brought the 5.0 back with dual overhead cams, a 7,000 RPM readline, and lots of thrust (412 hp, 390 ft/lbs. of torque). But, it’s more than that. The outstanding combination of comfort, handling, obtainable price, and sound make this such a complete, well-executed package. This American icon continues to be iconic.

Biggest Surprise: Cadillac CTS-V
Why: The CTS-V is a supercharged 6.2-liter V-8-powered luxury sport sedan. I knew it’d be fast, and figured it’d be a “nice” car. However, I didn’t expect it to be as fast or as nice as it was. It goes like hell, sounds like heaven, and has a cool interior (the speedometer and tachometer leave red trails as they rev up—really neat). Here again, the combination of suspension tuning, interior quality, outstanding exhaust note, and overall badassness really impressed me. It’s great to see American cars that are truly impressive!

Favorite Small Car: Honda CR-Z
Why: Hey, this is Subcompact Culture, right? Of the smaller vehicles at the event (not including the excellent Lotus Evora), the Honda CR-Z was a standout, and not just because it’s brand-spakin’ new. The combination of size, shape, and driving dynamics confirmed that the CR-Z is a fun, frugal, and reasonably priced car. The interior is appealing, the exterior looks better in person, and if driven like a hybrid in Eco mode, you will get better-than-EPA-rated fuel economy.

Most Amazing: Mercedes AMG SLS; Viper SRT10 (tie)
Why: Equally amazing cars for way different reasons. It’s a tale of the scalpel versus the sledgehammer. The AMG SLS is extremely fast, yet is easy to pilot, Its gorgeous, inviting and comfortable interior features gullwinged gateways. All superheros should be gifted an SLS AMG.

The Viper is punishingly fast and is more than two handfuls to control. Viper allows you to sit inside it and then makes you hold on for dear life under full throttle. The automotive equivalent of trying to ride a bull. Make that a rabid bull possessed by the devil—but in a totally good way.

They’re both stupendously powerful, perversely extreme in many aspects, and get more stares than Megan Fox at a nude corndog eating contest. And I’ve said too much.

Expect to see some more driving reports about these vehicles soon!

Source – Subcompact Culture

2010 Honda Accord Crosstour 2WD EX-L NAV

Vital Stats
Engine:
3.5 liter V6 (271 HP/254 TQ)
Drivetrain Layout:
Front engine/Front-wheel drive
Transmission:
5-speed automatic
Seating Capacity:
5 Passengers
EPA Fuel Economy:
18 city/27 highway
Base MSRP
$34,770 + $710 destination
Recommended Options:
None

The Basics
Honda hasn’t offered an Accord wagon since 1997, although this Crosstour isn’t exactly what most would call a wagon, per se. It is, however, another entry into the crowded and competitive crossover segment. Available in either front- or all-wheel drive, and with one engine and transmission choice, the Crosstour is basically an Accord V6 for people who want more space, available all-wheel drive, and a bit more of an active-lifestyle appearance. No one will be mistaking the Crosstour for a standard Accord, and its looks are love-it or leave-it.

Exterior (Andy – 2, Tae – 1)
Andy – I’ll just say it: I can’t stand the looks of this vehicle. I want to be able to like it for what it is, but I just can’t. It’s masculine  front end with a muscular grille seems to be contradicted by its feminine, sloping rear. It sits up high off the ground for added ground clearance, but this adds to the car’s awkward appearance. It just does not gel for me, no matter how many times I see it. To be fair, I had a couple of people come up to me and say they liked the look, and asked me what kind of car it was. If I could go directly from the house, and simply end up inside the Crosstour without looking at its exterior, that’d be great.

Tae – Sorry Andy, I’m gonna do one better (or worse?) than you… In some angles it reminds you of a pouty lipped Donald Duck, and it sort of looks like a reincarnated 1980 AMC Eagle. Whatever it is, it is not pretty. Also from judging from the early adopters of these oddbirds, the 1980 AMC Eagle analogy might be right.  Most people who’ve purchased these, at least in the SF Bay Area, are older ladies who might have owned those AMC Eagles back in the day.

Interior (Andy – 6, Tae – 6)
Andy –  The EX-L (with navigation) has an attractive, high-quality leather interior with plenty of room for two up front, and three in the back. Parts of the interior appear similar to the Acura TSX (especially the dashboard), but the Crosstour has more room, especially in the back seat. The car’s front seats are firm and large, but comfortable and supportive. The leather-wrapped steering wheel feels fairly large in diameter, but fits well in the hands, and has a veritable plethora of buttons (I believe about 17, if I remember correctly) to control Bluetooth, audio, and cruise controls.

The big story inside is found behind the rear seats. Open up the rear hatch, and the cargo area appears cavernous. Plus, there are two silver handles that fold down the rear seats for an amazing amount of room for gear. Unfortunately, due to the car’s shape, capacity is limited to not-so-tall items. On a trip to Lowe’s to return 100 ft. of garden hose (which we placed in a square plastic tub so as not to drip water on the upholstery), there was clearance issues with the rear hatch. Let’s put it this way: You can carry a lot of stuff in a horizontal fashion. But tall items could prove difficult. Under the cargo area is a convenient storage area in the center, and it can be removed, too. Great for tailgating at sporting event, I’m sure. There are two smaller compartments to the left and right, as well.

Another downer: Visibility out of the Crosstour is poor. It’s rear hatch creates a strange outward view, which is bisected by a crossmember on the trunk. It’s just hard to see out of, which is not confidence inspiring. Good thing my model had the rear backup camera.

Tae – The interior of the Crosstour is just like the Accord, Acura TSX, and Acura TL, except that some materials are decidedly cheaper. The typical Honda/Acura button porn is present. The cheap, fake simulated wood grain and painted plastic are all there. However, the fit-and-finish is still ‘Honda’ excellent! As far as passenger space is concerned, the front seats are comfortable – if not too flat. The backseats have ample room and leg space, but I’ll echo Andy’s take… the cargo space is limited due to the shape of the hatch area.

Drivetrain (Andy – 7, Tae – 7)
Andy – The 3.5 liter V6 is a smooth operator, as typical for Honda V6 engines, and is mated to a responsive five-speed automatic. Unlike some other vehicles in the segment, such as the Subaru Outback, there is no manual shifting capability, though. My review sample was the front-drive variant, but the Crosstour is available in all-wheel drive to do battle against the previously mentioned Outback. Like the Outback, the Crosstour does appear to have some added ground clearance, and wears some meaty 18” wheels and tires. No qualms here.

Tae – No major complaints here, good power and smooth transmission.

Performance (Andy – 7, Tae – 6.5)
Andy – As expected, the 271 hp V6 has more-than-adequate power. Merging and passing are effortless endeavors; mid-range acceleration is noteworthy. All in all, the Crosstour is pretty quick, especially from a rolling start.

Handling is tuned to ride quality than handling. Although, the car does remain planted in the curves, albeit, with substantial body lean. The car feels heavy, and does weigh on the near side of 4,000 lbs. Not so great for cornering, but the car feels like a tank on the highway; it definitely has a substantial feel. The Crosstour is rated at an estimated 18 city and 27 highway for fuel economy, and I got 18 MPG in 90% city driving.

Tae – Straightline performance is good, nothing spectacular, handling is on par with its competitors – Toyota Venza and Nissan Murano.

Ride Quality (Andy – 8, Tae – 6.5)
Andy –  This is a family cruiser, and it does this well. Ride quality is good, all but the largest bumps are easily soaked up by the fully independent suspension. The car is quiet and very comfortable.

Tae – One might think that wearing the 18″ rubbers instead of the 20-21″ ones found in its competitors (Venza and Murano), that the Crosstour would be quieter and more supple, in this case that would be a ‘no’. The Toyota Venza is a bit more composed and quieter, and the Nissan Murano is slightly more engaging to drive. But, all in all, the Crosstour is above average in this crossover segment.

Technology (Andy – 5, Tae – 6)
Andy – The Crosstour EX-L NAV has a lot of tech features. Problem is, they’re not user friendly. You get navigation; a fantastic seven-speaker, 360-watt AM/FM/6-disc/MP3 stereo; Bluetooth with HandsFreeLink; USB/auxiliary jacks; automatic dual-zone climate control; mirrors that automatically tilt down when you put the car in reverse; and a great back-up camera. However, you need a class on how to work it all. I counted 33 buttons on the dashboard—not exactly intuitive, especially while driving. A few times, all I wanted to do was turn up the heater, but attempting to do so ended up being a lesson in distracted driving. Also, I could not pair my phone with the Bluetooth, and I finally just gave up. Add to this the 17 or so buttons on the steering wheel, and you’ve got a mass of technology that requires an engineering degree to figure out. Without ranting too much, the large display screen is highly visible, and is all controlled via a center knob, just like the Acura TSX. I have mixed feelings about this control. Frankly, the whole thing was a bit frustrating.

The good news is all of the safety technology is there: ABS, traction/stability control, all the airbags you’ll want, etc. Luckily, you don’t have to learn to use those.

Tae – I wasn’t as flustered with the operations as Andy, but definitely ‘user friendly’ is not the ‘word of the day’, here. There’s a dedicated button for every feature/function of vehicle, it seems. Also, getting through the menu in the nav screen is a bit of a chore without the touchscreen, and some of you might already know how I feel on the voice command systems in current crop of cars – too big of a learning curve and too slow.

Value (Andy – 5, Tae – 5)
Andy – Your hard-earned $35,480 can nab you a ’10 Crosstour with leather, tons of technology, a somewhat usable cargo area, and front wheel drive. Want all-wheel drive? That’ll cost about $2,000 more in the same trim level. Yes, you do get a gusty V-6 and a good ride. Plus, the build quality is excellent. However, you can get a similarly equipped six-cylinder Subaru Outback Limited (with all-wheel drive) for about $5,500 less than a front-drive Crosstour.

Tae – As expensive as the Crosstour is, when you compare it to the two closest competitors (Venza and Murano) you’ll save about $1,800-2,500. But you’d be losing Venza’s comfort and Murano’s spirited nature, not to mention cargo space and most of all… STYLE!!!

Overall (Andy – 4, Tae – 3.5)
Andy – The Honda Accord Crosstour FWD is essentially Honda’s family wagon. You can get the kids in in, you can haul some cargo, and like the Family Truckster from “National Lampoon’s Vacation,”  it looks a bit goofy. However, if you have to have a wagon-like vehicle from Honda and don’t want to drive an Odyssey mini-van, then the Crosstour might fit the bill. Keep in mind Acura is releasing a TSX wagon, too. Albeit, it will probably cost more, but it looks a lot more attractive to me.  Let’s put it this way: Before I’d plunk down $35K for a Crosstour, I’d Cross-Shop the competition.

Tae – Although the content value is not bad, the poor practicality of the vehicle and the “WTF!” exterior design makes for a vehicle that is very puzzling. Honda is trying to market this vehicle as a trendy, hip alternative to crossover utility vehicles, and they’ve missed the mark – by a mile. From uglifying the Accord and the entire Acura lineup, killing off the NSX project, to hyping the two seater CR-Z hybrid sports car that goes 0-60 in 8 seconds and gets mid 30MPGs, I think Honda is slowly losing grip on reality.

- KF

As you may have heard, Honda has shown us the production version of its highly anticipated CR-Z hybrid. Dubbed a “Sport Hybrid Coupe” by Honda, many people were hoping for a worthy successor to the iconic CRX. There’s been a lot of buzz, so here are my two cents.

THE CRX …
The CRX was always light weight, maneuverable, frugal, and fairly inexpensive. It was a Spartan front-wheel driver with two seats, and although it didn’t have tons of power (never more than 108 hp in the U.S.), it never weighed much, either (no more than 2,174 lbs.). That equated to one of the most fun cars you could buy that drove the wrong wheels front wheels—and you could get up to 50 mpg with the HF model. Even the sporty Si got an EPA estimated 32/35 MPG.

2011 CR-Z SPECS
When Honda put out its press release at the 2010 Detroit Auto Show last week, the car’s specifications looked a bit underwhelming to those hoping for an updated CRX.

According to the press release, the CR-Z will make 122 hp and twist 128 ft./lbs. of torque and and get 36 city, 38 highway with the CVT, and 31/37 with the six-speed manual. Wait—isn’t his a hybrid? Not exactly impressive, eh? Allegedly, the car will weigh 2,800 lbs., no doubt due to its heavy batteries. So 2,800 lbs with only 122 hp/128 tq doesn’t sound like we should expect too much performance.

However, this is the missing link: performance numbers. If this thing is mega quick and handles like a Ferrari—or at least an Acrua RSX—then perhaps the haters will be somewhat silenced. And maybe it has fantastic driving dynamics. Then again, with the power-to-weight ratio, perhaps there won’t be much to see.

CR-Z STYLING
The other bane of those hoping for a new CRX is the CR-Z’s styling, most notably the overly large frontal overhang. Indeed, there is a lot of material in front of the front wheels. This is classically something that does not contribute to a sporty look. Although I’m not a fan of the front end, I do like the car’s rear, and I like the interior, too. And, with the optional 17″ wheels, I don’t think it looks too bad, even with the overbite.

BOTTOM LINE
I’m withholding a final verdict until I can 1) see the car in person, 2) read some performance numbers, and 3) drive one. However, thus far, these specs, fuel economy—and the frontal overhang—aren’t too hot.

What really gets me is the fuel economy, though. A non-hybrid, manual-transmission-equipped 2010 Honda Fit gets 33 highway MPG. The much larger Honda Insight hybrid gets 40/43 MPG. The old Insight hybrid got 49/59 with a manual transmission, and it was a two-door coupe, too.

So, why does a new tiny hybrid two-door coupe only get 37 highway MPG? The answer, I’m hoping, is because of outstanding performance … but I’m not holding my breath.

Anyway, check out the video from the introduction at the Detroit Auto Show:

Courtesy of our content partner: Subcompact Culture

Recently we showcased a list of well loved and used cars you can have fun with for $2,500, all while keeping some hard earned money in the bank. This time around, here is a list of appropriate track rats, autocross carvers, and grudge night contenders that will still have life in them, and shiny paint on the hood. Any of these can be used as a reliable daily driver (well, maybe not the 944), and should offer their new owners plenty of service life.

KF E36E36 BMW M3
Best steering rack in the world? Check. Reliable drivetrain? Check. One of the best balanced cars BMW has ever made? Check. Reliably putting out 240HP, and sending the power rearward through a slick shifting transmission, the M3 offers the driver the best of everything. A spartan but well designed interior, a surprisingly comfortable ride, and enough grip to distort your passengers faces. This masterpiece is at home on the track, slicing between cones, or leaving your friends in the dust on your favorite back road. Just look out of electrical issues, coolant system leaks, and cracked rear subframes.

KF BugeyeBugeye Subaru WRX
Thanks to the Gran Turismo video game franchise, the WRX exploded into our country offering cheap performance that knew how to handle corners. Years later, they make cheap track toys, and can be easily modded for some very big power. Older 2.0L flat fours are known for having an on/off switch for a turbo (ie turbo lag), but on what track do you find yourself below 3,000 rpms anyway? So what if they look a little goofy, and scream like a pissed off Wookie at redline? They’ll notchy shift ahead of plenty of “better” cars at a track in the right hands. Do watch out for heavily abused multi owner cars that are run through.

KF C4C4 Chevrolet Corvette
With massive grip and plenty of torque on hand, the C4 is a very capable car. While they aren’t known for having the most accurate steering racks, or the tightest chassis in the world, they dance through corners at very alarming rates of speed. Large clutches, strong transmissions, and nearly bullet proof engines mean this is a car that can be abused, neglected, and still be expected to run. Search hard, and it’s possible to find some low miles, gently driven examples that will put a huge smile on your face every time you drive. Try to stick to the coupes though, as the convertibles flex like a limp noodle.

KF B5B5 Audi S4
The Audi that dethroned the E36 M3 back in the 1990′s, the S4 offers an intoxicating blend of straight line speed, secure AWD handling, and a very well appointed interior. The Quattro drive train does lend itself to resolute understeer, but its forgiving nature makes it an easy car to jump in and explore the limits without getting bitten. Watch out for worn turbos (you were going to do the K04 upgrade anyway weren’t you), abused transmissions from AWD launches, and the gremlins we swear the Germans design into their electronics. Out of the bunch, the S4 is the jack of all trades, and makes a wonderful daily driver.

KF Z32Z32 Nissan 300ZX Turbo
After creating the sales-chart dominating 240Z, Nissan (Datsun) went through most of the late 70′s and the 80′s with sub-par sports cars. Then in 1989, they unleashed the beast with the Z32 300ZX Turbo. Not only you had one of the best designed cars in the world, but the Z could back up the looks with excellent performance. The Z was comfortable on the highway and was a force on the race tracks. Due to the cult following of these cars, finding one in good condition shouldn’t be too difficult. Watch out for examples with front end collision history, the tight engine bay makes for a nightmarish vehicle to repair properly.

KF SN95SN-95 Ford Mustang GT
Still riding on the archaic Fox body platform, the SN-95 still appeals to our inner hooligans. Laying down rubber through the first few gears off a stop light is easy, as are forest fire amounts of smoke when doing donuts. The robust drivetrain just screams abuse me, and who knew doing the worst things to a car could be oh so rewarding. Cheap to mod, these are common sights at local legal and illegal drag races, and are tame enough to be driven to and from the track. Handling numbers won’t always impress, but powersliding out of the corner trailing twin lines of rubber is more fun anyway.

KF EM1EM1 Honda Civic Si
Devouring corners with tenacity, this double wishbone front driver has a playful nature that is not found in modern FWD cars, new Si included. Light accurate steering combined with a brilliant gearbox make this little car a joy to hustle around. With the perfect amount of rotation on corner entry, and an easy ability to meter out power on the exit, the Si rewards the skilled, and helps the hamfisted. Returning great fuel economy, and touting Honda’s reliability, you can scream ‘VTEC just kicked in, yo!’ for hundreds of thousands of miles. Watch out for ricer mods, Pep Boy Intakes, and poorly fitting wire mesh grills and fart can exhausts.

KF 951951 Porsche 944 Turbo
The poor mans Porsche might just be one of the most well behaved of that era. While the non turbos are quite a bit more reliable, reliability and 944 aren’t exactly friends. What the 944 is dear friends with though is a challenging road or track. With enough power to pull itself around quickly, and tight body motions that make changing direction effortless, the 944 is a monster in skilled hands. With none of the quirky pendulum characteristics of the older 911, this is a great Porsche for beginners. Just make sure you have a stone cold reliable daily driver, as this car tends to suffer from plenty of little issues.

KF JZZ30JZZ30 Lexus SC 300
A leap forward in Toyota’s design interpretation, the Lexus SC coupes were so daring that the Japanese customers complained that the car was too futuristic. The ‘bathtub’ second generation SC 430 is the proof of these said complaints. To compliment the boring LS and the ES sedans, Lexus introduced this luxury cruiser in 1992. The Lexus SC 300 can be had with the manual transmission, but finding one can be very hard. This chassis is flexible enough to accept any drivetrain from the JDM Soarer/Aristo’s 2.5 liter twin turbo engine, Supra’s 3.0 liter twin turbo engine, to the newer Toyota/Lexus V8 engines.

KF C170C170 Ford SVT Focus
Someone call down to Hell and see what the temperature is. It’s still hot? That’s odd, because here is a Ford that not only handles well, but trounces most of the competition. Coming out when Ford really turned around their product lineup, this little hatch drove worlds better than any front driver Ford had ever made, and better than almost all of the rivals. Matching a strong engine to a close ratio 6 speed making straight line runs fun, but flying into turns way too hot, sliding to slow down, and powering out is where the real entertainment is at. Plus, it’s cost effective and well designed rear suspension make bumpy sections of track a non issue.

Honorable Mentions:

E38 BMW 740i
What? Tuner car? Come again! With the extremely low purchase price, the VIP tuning scene has been growing steadily. Picking up a clean E38 should be easy to accomplish well under this price cap, and leave you some money in the bank for mods. What’s common? On top of a full detail, lowering it to an almost undriveable height, exhaust, a full host of in car entertainment, and a nice upgrade from the stock wheels. While you wont see many of these barges carving along back roads, they’re becoming a lot more common sight at car shows. Just remember, it was a very expensive car when it was new, and it still costs your first born to maintain.

Y33 Inifinti Q45
Keeping in theme with VIP (‘bippu’ in Japanese) tuning, no VIP tuning talk can be complete without having this Q-ship in the discussion. Even though the Infiniti Q45 always played ‘the other Japanese luxury car’ role, when it comes to VIP, the Lexus LS takes the back seat. Because Q45′s ‘statesman’ styling and the low resale value, the Q45 is the VIP tuning crowd’s favorite.

Z16A Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4
Two turbos, AWD, and more gadgets and gizmos than the Apollo Program. These porkers might not love corners as much as a Z32, but are surprisingly fun to drive hard. With more than 300 horsepower on tap, it’s easy to get into trouble quickly if you’re used to driving a commuter car. As a rolling testament to technological excess, these can be a nightmare to maintain, but can be ever so rewarding when working correctly.

-KF

teslaroadsterDespite hybrid vehicles being the standard of green vehicles today, the debate rages on. The big debate in the future of automobiles comes down to these two major technologies – electric batteries or hydrogen fuel cells.

Let’s get this straight, they are both electric vehicles. But the differences are how the electricity is generated and stored. Electric vehicles get and store electricity from an outside source, such as a household power outlet. Hydrogen Fuel Cell vehicles generate their own electricity by converting pressurized hydrogen into energy.

So what’s better?

hondafcxclarityIf you happened to catch the latest Top Gear episode on BBC or BBC America, the UK boys bashed the Tesla Motors’ Roadster for being irrelevant and unreliable. We know now that the unreliability was staged, and the ‘being irrelevant’ is just the Top Gear boys’ opinion. I loved it especially, when they traced the power source of the household power plug all the way to a heavy polluting power plant. It is very, very suggestive and misleading. Mr. May and Mr. Clarkson also suggested that hydrogen fuel cells are the wave of the future and introduced the Honda’s new FCX Clarity. Maybe, Top Gear is drinking Honda flavored Kool-Aid.

Can Jeremy Clarkson and the rest of the Top Gear crew tell us how they process pressurized liquid hydrogen? Or how the hydrogen might be delivered to the filling stations? Not to mention retrofitting the current gas stations to facilitate liquid hydrogen storage and dispensing. Electricity can be produced with solar, wind, and/or with hydro-power plants, which last time we checked, does not pollute our environment. A key factor that no one seem to be bringing up is that in order to produce liquid hydrogen, you need electricity!

toyotairealIn a ideal world, we would have two types of vehicles in our garages… or two types of mobility. One should be a electric personal mobile, commuter, or errand-runner. Much like the Segway, you plug it in to recharge at night then you take it to do errands or go to work in it. A fine example of this would be the Toyota iReal (see left). The other mode of transportation should only be used when you need space for more than one person and/or need long cruising distances. That could be either gas, electric, or hybrid drivetrain. But realistically, most people can or will have one vehicle. If that’s the case, make it electric. As the battery technology improve, so will the performance of the electric vehicles. With hydrogen fuel cells, you might have to replace the whole entire fuel cell or the vehicle, itself, for the same improvement of upgraded batteries on pure electric vehicles.

Sometimes, we make simple solutions get out of hand and make it complicated somehow…

-KF

The US has always been an interesting market for auto makers to tackle. Many of them would create seeming hit models only to fall flat in the end. Take for example the mid 90′s BMW 3 Series. The car was a success both in Europe and the US, so naturally BMW decided to add the hatch back version to the US line-up thinking that it would share the same success it saw in Europe. Unfortunately, sales were less than impressive so the 3 Series hatch never saw US soil again. Both foreign and domestic automakers have always been reluctant to bring models they have in other countries to the US. Weather it be the restraints of emission and safety regulations or hatchback-phobia, the US has missed out on some absolutely brilliant cars that have been the desire of car fans across the country. In no particular order, here are 10 of the models that touched our hearts but never touched our home soil (well, not officially).

2003 BMW M3 CSL (E46)
bmw-m3-cslCoupe, Sport, Light. With even the slightest mention of these words near any BMW fan in the US, they’ll start drooling and panting uncontrollably. Shortly after they will pull every last hair on their head, fall to their knees and in a mad fit of rage and confusion, scream to the car gods, “WHY?! WHY NOT HERE?” OK, not exactly, but that is the equivalent emotion felt by avid BMW fans who long for this car. It was more powerful, louder, lighter, lower, stiffer, grippier, and above all, more fun than the already popular M3. Visually the car had subtle additions like the carbon fiber roof, a bumper mounted intake, a more aerodynamically sculpted trunk, and bigger, lighter wheels. Underneath the hood was a different story. What BMW did to the 3 Series to make the M3 is the same thing they did to make the M3 CSL from the M3 (So would this be the M-M3?). It’s performance increase over the M3 is significant and quantifiable but utterly irrelevant. Tiff Needell of Brittan’s 5th Gear TV show once screamed, “I don’t care if it is faster! I just sounds faster!” as he plowed up through the gears. This car brought back the true spirit of “M.” Initially the M3 CSL had no radio, no AC, no leather, and was only available in SMG (which did perform better on the track). Comfort and convenience went out the window and performance was the sole focus, a feat last seen only in the first ever M3 (E30). Why the US never saw this masterpiece is beyond me. If BMW managed to get the M3 CSL here legally, it would have instantly sold out.

1999-2002 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec (R34)
nissan-skyline-gtr-r34-blueOK so we finally have the GT-R here, but we never saw this one. This was the first of the Skylines to really jump off the technological deep end. It was the first real-life video game. Like the Nissan GT-R we now have, this car could make even the most appalling drivers look like pros. Whatever mistake you made, the committee of on-board computers would make appropriate corrections by diverting power funds to the proper locations. This car could read your mind. Whatever you were trying to do, it somehow knew what  you wanted and gave you more. Couple that to its estimated 350BHP turbocharged 2.6L in-line six and you had a car that was almost unstoppable.  All of the advantages of front, rear and all-wheel drive were present with few of the disadvantages. As if this wasn’t enough, Nissan made the V-Spec Nur variant, which improved the already fantastic suspension and engine. In 2007, our prayer was finally answered. The successor to the R34 Skyline, the Nissan GT-R (R35) arrived in US showrooms and quickly sold out for more than MSRP. Just don’t try to import an R34, even through Florida; it just may end up crushed into tin cans when the Fed’s find out, and that my car enthusiast friends, is a crime against humanity.

1997-2000 and 2001-2005 Honda Civic Type R (EP and EK)
civic-typer-epThe Type R badge is the rice rocket wet dream. Honda had great success with the Integra Type R in the US.  Before the great crash of the auto industry, a used Integra Type R in good condition would cost you well over $20,000. However, no other Type R made it to the US. Hatchback-phobia again is the problem with the Civic Type R. Critics hailed this souped-up city runabout as the typical high revving torqueless go-cart we’ve all come to expect from Honda. Although the newer EP’s suspension was less advanced as its predecessors double wishbone, it handled as well as the best of its competition.

honda-civic-type-r-ek9The US did get the hatchback Civic Si, an anemic version of the Civic Type R, but it was not nearly as successful as its sedan predecessor, which played a large roll in Honda’s decision not to introduce the Type R in the US. Like the BMW M3 CSL, the Type R does not simply represent higher performance numbers. It represents a huge worldwide following which some have dubbed a religion. Other cars that received the Type R treatment include the Accord and NSX. The removal of sound insulation and the addition of under-body aero lead the NSX Type R to nearly tie the Ferrari 360 Challenge Stradale’s lap time of the Nürburgring Nordschleife. Do not despair for there is good news for the Civic Type R in the US! A Type R sedan had been released in Japan with speculation that it might come Stateside. We’ll keep you posted.

1991-1993 Lancia Delta Integrale
800px-lancia_delta_integrale_evo_2_img_9403Considered to be the world’s ultimate hot hatch, the Lancia Delta Integrale first hit Europe’s streets in1991. Many things we consider as ordinary features on most cars today were standard on this high performance model Delta. It had a 2.0L turbo four that churned 215HP and came with an advanced torsion AWD unit capable of sending power as need to wheels that had more traction with a distribution of almost 50:50 front to rear, perfect for lurid slides in the dirt. But the engine and drive train were relatively unchanged from it’s lesser Turbo HF leaving the only difference to the suspension.  The Delta Integrale was wider and stiffer giving it better performance on and off road. (Yes I did say off road) It’s most distinguishing feature are the rally inspired light weight wheels and aggressive body kit resembling it’s rally counterpart.  In 1993, computers were added to the cars brain which gave it variable ignition timing, less intrusive emission control, idle control (VW MkII fans will appreciate this), and boost control which reduced turbo lag. Emission laws again spoil our fun in the US and that inexplicable fear of hatches. However, look closely and you’ll find a few gray market imports lurking about. I spotted a black one in San Mateo, California just a few blocks from downtown.

1998 Subaru Imprezza 22B STi/WRX STi Type R
1998_subaru_impreza_22b_sti-2The Imprezza 22B sold out just after it went on sale. It was in such high demand that it was rumored even the late Colin McRae had to pay for his.  For those of you who are unfamiliar with this beast, Subaru decided to celebrate their 40th birthday and dominant 3rd title of World Rally Championship by making the 22B. Their driver, Colin McRae, was largely responsible for their success that year. Subaru claimed their car made 276BHP, the mandated limit for cars sold in Japan, but many have spun the dyno rollers at a higher number.  Although it was based on the Imprezza chassis, the 22B was noticeably wider and was equipped with road clawing suspension, eye-popping brakes and a more aggressive AWD setup.  The WRX Coupe R the common man’s 22B.  It lacked the wide body and power but had equally aggressive suspension and had a detuned version of the 22B’s engine. Both cars had enough power to hurl themselves up against their top-gear rev limiter thanks to the short ratio differential. This made it the perfect weekend track warrior. Emission laws barred these mischievous siblings from the US.

2002-2003 Ford Focus RS
ford_focus_rs_frontThe biggest criticism of American cars is the notion that they are undesirable. Well, here’s a very desirable one. Meet the Ford Focus RS. It’s a more powerful, more nimble Focus.  Ford’s European design division came up with the internationally successful Focus and consequently entered it into WRC competition which was also driven by Colin McRae. Their tribute car came in the form of the Focus RS. Though not a huge departure from the standard Focus, the first RS was equipped with a 2.0L turbo four producing a modest 205 HP. Earlier this year, the second generation Focus RS hit European showrooms with a whopping 300+HP turbocharged five-cylinder from Volvo. The first generation Focus RS would have been a patriotic and unique alternative to the Japanese Evo’s and STI’s. More importantly it might have helped put the US automaker back on the map at home.

1957-1975 Fiat Abarth 600/695/850
header_89675No, the year range is not a typo. This is one of Italy’s most quintessential cars. Its style and superior performance was everything that was Italian all in a compact aluminium shell with wheels. In Italy during the 60′s a gorgeous woman could be called “Abarthizzata.” Other than working it’s way into modern Italian vocabulary, the Abarth’s racing counterparts were successful in their classes which included touring cars. Early versions put out only a mere 27BHP while the later 850SS models were rated a almost 100BHP and were capable of reaching speeds close to 120MPH. Fiat has revived this model in Europe and has specifically announced its plans to bring the car to America. With its purchase of Chrysler, Fiat has perfect distribution method for the 500 Abarth. Just as BMW did with Mini, Fiat will sell the 500 through Chrysler dealerships.

1986-1989 Porsche 959
959-3We have yet another car inspired by rally racing; this one is from the Group B era. For those who don’t know, Group B era ended because the cars were too fast and too dangerous. So, Porsche decided to make a production version of the car that was too dangerous for racing drivers. This monstrosity gave new meaning to the word ridiculous. Remember, this car showed up in the mid 80′s and could time warp you to 60MPH in 3.7 seconds and to the quarter mile in 11.8 seconds.  These figures were pure insanity in the 80′s. The only car to out accelerate the 959 was the famed McLaren F1, which showed up in the 90′s. Speed wasn’t the only thing it had. Style, reliability and handling were in equal abundance.  The Porsche-Steuer Kupplung (PSK) AWD unit, the most advanced of its time, could direct 80% of available power to the rear when needed, the shocks could be adjusted electronically to various comfort and sport settings, it’s aerodynamics produced no lift which made it drivable at its top speed of almost 200MPH, and it sported super light weight magnesium alloy wheels which burn a blinding white when lit on fire. Porsche refused to send the US Department of Transportation the four 959s required for crash testing, so the car was never brought here by Porsche. However, since the “Show and Display” law, the car now meets crash test standards and can be fitted with emissions equipment to make the car legal in the US.

1983-1991 Audi Sport Quattro
97_audi_sport_quattro_1985_01_bThis is the great grandmother of all of Audi’s AWD cars. The Audi Sport Quattro housed the same AWD unit used in Audi’s legendary Group B rally car and has been handed down to all of Audi’s cars. Quattro is the pride of all Audi fans and it was the reason of the car’s dominance in Group B. The rally version eventually made well over 500BHP and is still one of the most powerful rally cars ever built. The production version made a modest 305BHP from a 2.1L in-line five. Even 17 years later, the Audi Sport Quattro could up keep up with the far more advanced Mitsubishi Lance Evolution VI. Only 224 were ever made and none were sent to the US, although gray market cars have been spotted. Emission laws again prove to be a thorn in the side of many automakers attempting to bring cars into the US.

1990-1994 Nissan Pulsar GTi-R
nissan_pulsar_gti-r_1Yet another feather-weight rally inspired hot hatch that never saw the Red, White, and Blue. This car is like a baby Skyline GT-R. It had similar AWD unit and an exclusive turbo-charged engine with 2 less cylinders and 1 liter less displacement. Other goodies included a snazzy body kit, sporty suspension, and big brakes. This car was available in left hand drive but only made it as far as UK in its westward travels. It was very quick for its day and had a matching chassis making a great competitor to the Subaru WRX and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, but in a smaller, cuter package.

-KF

Here are the parameters – under $2,500, under 25 years old, and tuner friendly. These cars can be picked up easily, and provide the owner with a unique and fun driving experience. If you are looking for a cheap way to get into racing, a mountain rat, or a commuter, any of these will put a smile on your face.

Here are our top cars, listed in alphabetical order:

The yuppie mobile lives.1985-1992 BMW 325i (E30)
The yuppy mobile from the 1980′s has become quite a favorite beater. With powerful inline 6 cylinder engines, smooth shifting manual transmissions, and just the right amount of built in oversteer, the E30 is one part daily driver one part canyon carver. Maybe that’s why it was so popular in the 1980′s. Check for head gasket leaks, worn suspension bushings, and electrical gremlins.
-Torquey and wonderful sounding engines
-Balanced chassis with crisp turn in
-Engine bay can swallow any engine BMW has made
-Robust drivetrains will survive an atomic blast

Big V8 power on the cheap

1993-1999 Pontiac Trans Am/Chevy Camaro Z28 (F-Body)
The car that typifies American muscle. LT1/LS1 engines are near bullet-proof and are insane torque monsters. The torque makes it more fun to drive than the Mustang, but it is generally not as reliable as the Mustang.
-Durable, abuse proof drivetrains
-Tall 6th gear means no highway fuel mileage penalty
-Lots of mechanical grip, and can be driven very hard in the right hands
-High RPM launch will produce more smoke than a volcano
-Once something fails, parts are easy to find

Cheap, RWD, and a covertible to boot.

1992-1998 Mazda Miata (NA)
This is the sports car that the British companies have been trying to make for years. A spiritual successor to the MGs, but patterned after the Lotus Elan. Be sure to get the 1.8 liter engine, as the 1.6 liter is too weak for the U.S. roads. The cloth tops can be high maintenance.
-Modern Japanese interpretation of the famed Lotus Elan
-Immense aftermarket support
-Nimble, durable RWD car is perfect for track days or autocrosses
-Numerous engine swaps, with a chassis to match the power

The sweet whine of a rotary.

1986-1992 Mazda RX-7 Turbo II (FC3S)
The poorman’s Porsche 928, it was probably the last vehicle that Mazda designed without Ford’s intervention. Lightweight chassis with a strong rotary engine. A very capable handler, the RX-7 makes a living in the mountain roads, and is a very underrated car. Only downers are the finicky engine, as it  tends to burn oil, and the apex seal can be a wallet opener.
-Lightweight
-Smooth and strong transmission
-Powerful turbocharged rotary engine
-Good aftermarket support
-Very nimble and tossable

Weld the diff, and drift into the sunset.

1989-1993 Nissan 240SX (S13)
Since the rise in popularity of drifting, the S13 and S14 240SX/Silvia/200SX models have been the king of drifting circuits. The car provides the driver with ultra-reliability, near-perfect balance, forgiving handling, and lightweight chassis. The timing chain guides are the weak point in these cars.
-Huge tuning community
-Easy engine swap candidate i.e. RB, SR, KA-T
-Reliable
-Easy to tune out the inherent understeer
-Prime drift vehicle

Exciting, nimble and reliable FWD fun.

1991-1994 Nissan Sentra SE-R (B13)
Heralded as the new BMW 2002, it made numerous publications’ ‘best of’ awards. Now a cult-classic, if you can find one in a good condition, it is simply a blast to drive. The SE-R is prone to rust and 5th gear grind problems.
-Indestructible SR20 motor
-Revs nicely to its high redline
-Independent rear suspension
-Lightweight
-Nimble and responsive steering
-Mods aplenty

Try hard, and you'll spin all four tires off a stoplight.

1990-1994 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX/Eagle Talon TSi/Plymouth Laser Turbo AWD (1G)
The first affordable supercar. It handles great, looks good, and can be very fast. This is the predecessor to the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. Be wary of the horrible blindspot in the C-pillar, and modded/high mileage engines that can blow up (dreaded and debated crankwalk).
-All-wheel drive fun
-Easy to tune for high HP numbers
-AWD models make for brutal launches
-Can easily convert the non-AWD models to AWD via GSX parts

Best way to enjoy mid engine fun without buying a Lotus

1985-1994 Toyota MR2 (MkI & MkII)
In the early 80′s, Lotus contracted Toyota to develop a high performance engine for a lightweight mid-engined vehicle (does that sound familiar? – Lotus Elise). Lotus and Toyota soon broke off the contract and Toyota was stuck with the project. Hence, the MR2 was born – the father of Lotus Elise. First generation has leaky t-top seals, and second generation cars can have unpredictable handling.
-Cheap, fun way to get a mid-engined car
-Easy and plentiful Toyota motor swaps
-Insane lateral grip
-Aftermarket air intake snorkels that can catch dinner

Clean lines, great power.

1986.5-1992 Toyota Supra Turbo (JZA70)
It was once touted as Japan’s Corvette fighter, but it’s actually a rival to the Nissan 300ZX. The Supra sports clean lines, a great presence on the road, smooth powerful turbocharged inline-6 engine. However, it is a heavy car, and t-top seals can leak.
-Excellent engine
-Nice interior
-Very high HP capability
-Great high speed stability
-Smooth shifting transmission
-Phenomenal cruising car

Favorite for cheap tuning, and autocross finesse.

1986-1992 Volkswagen GTI (A2)
The original hot-hatch, the car that started the genre. After this car, came a explosion of affordable hatchbacks with high performance capabilities, especially in Europe. Based on the Golf platform, parts are easy to obtain, and the GTI is very tossable for a front-wheel drive vehicle. Some electronic gremlins might come into play.
-Lightweight, very nimble
-Autocross monster with basic mods
-Brisk acceleration with a 2.0L 16V
-Popular chassis means major mods have a proven path

Honorable Mentions:

1985-1987 Toyota Corolla (AE86)
Would have been in the top 10, but it is too old and the average one is well above our price cap thanks to Takumi and his tofu delivering fans.
-Short wheelbase, RWD fun
-Legendary handling
-4A-GE can be swapped easily for a more potent unit
-Ability to drift while delivering tofu
-Can flip for a profit if you find someone selling one who doesn’t understand the drifting craze

1987-1993 Ford Mustang (Fox Body)
5.0! Need we say more?
-Dirt cheap
-Reliable, and resistant to abuse
-Super cheap to make it fast

1988-1991 Honda CRX Si (ED9)
Economical, quick, fun, and reliable.
-Design ancestor to both Honda Insight and Toyota Prius
-Very reliable
-Auto-Cross worthy, fun front-wheel drive chassis

-KF

The car that started it all. The Acura Legend.

The car that started it all. The Acura Legend.

When the Honda executives decided to market its flagship vehicle in the U.S., they made a wise decision to create a new brand. Back in 1986, there was no way that the public would pay more than $20,000 for a Honda. Honda and other Japanese imports still had a stigma of being cheap, reliable cars. Nothing about them said anything luxury. Just think Hyundai about 3 or 4 year ago, in the pre-Genesis days.

They created a new brand and logo by closing the gap on the top of the ‘H’ logo to resemble a set of calipers, and called it Acura. With the introduction of the Legend and Integra, Acura was an instant success. The Acura Legend could be had with luxury amenities found in most luxury cars such as leather interior, sunroof, premium audio, power accessories, and a powerful six cylinder engine. Integra was a fun-to-drive, economical, compact car for those who wanted a little more than a Civic.

The Integra made performance luxury affordable.

The Integra made 'performance-luxury' affordable.

In the late 80′s, being the only Japanese premium marque, Acura marketed itself to be the luxury sport brand. And it worked. Then came Toyota and Nissan with Lexus and Infiniti, respectively. By the mid 90′s, one particular competitor has not only passed them up, but have become a dominant name in the segment. The nameplate was Lexus. Lexus’s wild success made Infiniti go back to the drawing board several times, and Acura was forced into a niche market.

Fast forward to today, and you have Lexus as the best selling luxury marque in the U.S.. Infiniti established itself as the performance luxury brand. What about Acura? Well… They have become a ‘ultra-Accord’ brand.

All of today's Acuras feature the controversial 'shield' grill.

All of today's Acuras feature the controversial 'shield' grill.

TSX is a European Honda Accord, TL is a fancy American Accord, RL is a larger Accord, RSX is a TSX cross-over, and MDX is an RL cross-over. So the whole entire line-up being a variation of the Accord, can they really be called a luxury brand? Not a single RWD vehicle, nothing larger than a 3.7 liter V6 in their stable, what type of customers are they attracting?

Some will argue that Infiniti is a one-trick pony as well with everything being a variation of a the G-series. That is true, but the Nissan’s premium brand has somethings that luxury buyers look for – rear-wheel drive chassis and V8 engines. What about Audi? All Audis are AWD and offer V8 and V10 engines in the top sedans and coupes.

The plan for the Acura brand, as late as early 2009, was to have a RWD chassis and at least a V8 engine. But they have canceled that development, blaming the global economical downturn. We argue that Honda cannot afford not to develop a RWD chassis and at least a V8 engine to stay competitive in this market. Or, they might as well as change their Acura brand name to ‘Accora’.

-KF

2009 Toyota Corolla. The KarFarm's Commuter Champion

2009 Toyota Corolla. The KarFarm's Commuter Champion of 2009.

Most of us outside of NYC, Boston, and Washington D.C. have to drive to our work and home. The daily grind that we call ‘commuting’ can be a chore or a joy depending on the automobile that we pilot. For some, the commuter might be a BMW 3-series or a Chevrolet Tahoe, but when someone says ‘commuter’ it is hard for anyone to think of those examples as such.

Since all the 2009 models have been introduced, and most of us are getting taxes done, it is time to pick the best commuting car on the market. The criteria is simple. Under $20k, including options, and must be able to seat at least 4 adults – for carpooling. The following are our recommendations for the 2009.

KarFarm’s Commuter Champion of 2009

Toyota Corolla LE
You can get them for under $15k. The Corolla is good looking, super fuel efficient, has excellent ‘commuter’ suspension, comfortable driving position, and it is quieter than any car in its class. It is also cheaper than dirt to insure. If you get one of these bad boys in white, silver, or gold you might get it mistaken for a Indian software engineer’s car, but the value to product proposition is too great to pass it up, making it the KarFarm’s Commuter Champion.

The Runner-ups

2009 Honda Civic LX. Sportier than the Corolla, but not as comfortable.

2009 Honda Civic LX. Sportier than the Corolla, but not as comfortable.

Honda Civic LX
If the Corolla is too blah for you, then the Civic will be your calling. If the Corolla is the Indian software engineer’s car du jour, then your Civic will get looks from the boy racers. The Civic is not quite as refined as the Corolla, but is as fuel efficient and reliable. Some will find the Civic to be a little more fun to drive, but the styling is subjective. There is nothing wrong about the Civic, and we highly recommend it.

2009 Mini Copper. The most fun of the bunch.

2009 Mini Copper. The most fun of the bunch.

Mini Cooper
The Corollas and the Civics are too boring you say? Mini Cooper might be the ticket if you value driving dynamics and nostalgic styling. Also the perfect car for city driving, such as in San Francisco, where the parking is tight and scarce. The reliability is a small issue; it is average at best, but it’s one of the tops in fuel economy. Another category that the Mini leads in is the resale value, it carries the highest resale value of any car, but it is the most expensive of the bunch. No one can deny that the Mini is a fun car inside out and a blast to drive.

2009 Scion xB. Fun and versatile makes excellent commuter.

2009 Scion xB. Fun and versatile, it makes excellent commuter.

Scion xB
At about $16,500 you get six airbags, ABS, Brake Assist, Electronic Brake Force Distribution, keyless entry, Vehicle Stability Control, Traction Control, full iPod integrated Pioneer audio system, a 2.4 liter engine with 158hp, and 1 yr complimentary maintenance service package. Those are some of the items in the endless list of standard features on this Box. Surprisingly fun to drive, tons of useful space, hidden storage compartment galore, and has more than enough power to make it a fun drive. The Scion xB makes a statement – even if you are not trying to.

-KF