
2010 Acura TSX V6 with Technology Package
Vital Stats
Engine: 3.5 liter V6 (280HP/254TQ)
Drivetrain Layout: Front engine/Front wheel drive
Transmission: 5 Speed Automatic
Seating Capacity: 5 Passengers
EPA Fuel Economy: 18 city/27 highway
Base MSRP $37,950 + $810 (destination charge)
Recommended Options: no options, only accessories available
The Basics
The Acura TSX made its debut, in the US Market, back in 2004. It was basically a rebadged European Market Honda Accord (quite bit smaller than the ‘fat American’ version). The first generation TSX looked tidy, handled great (for a FWD midsize car), and was somewhat a good value for the money.
For the 2009 model year, Acura introduced the second generation TSX (also rebadged Euro Accord). It is significantly bigger, especially the width, but its 2.4 liter 4 cylinder engine was a carryover from the smaller, previous TSX. The second generation TSX, being larger and heavier, wasn’t as quick or nimble to drive.
So what did Honda engineers do to remedy the situation? Of course, they went to the School of American Car Engineering… put a bigger engine in it!
Highs: great fit-and-finish, good power
Lows: not as fun to drive as competitors, button-happy interior, no longer charming
Exterior (Tae – 7, Andy – 7.5)
Tae – Love it or hate it, the Acura’s signature shield/tooth/beak grille is present on the TSX… but out of the current Acura line up, the Shield doesn’t look too out of place on the TSX. When you can pry your eyes off from the grille, the rest of the body is modern and the design is inoffensive and neutral. The stance is fairly wide, giving it somewhat athletic look to the car.
Andy – Also not a fan of the chrome grille treatment, although it looks better on the TSX than just about any other Acura. The rest of the car is typical Honda/Acura understatement—classy and sophisticated, but it doesn’t do much to excite me.

Interior (Tae – 7, Andy –
Tae – Can we say button-porn??? Buttons galore! It’s as if Honda’s interior designers purposely dedicated a button for each function of the vehicle, maybe they had old people in mind. They really could have trimmed down on the number of buttons. Another thing is that if you put this interior next to the regular everyday Euro Accord (or even the American Accord); it is pretty much the same – Acura is supposed to be a ‘premium brand’, right? I really hate to keep going on about the negatives about this interior (it’s really not that bad, but the bad parts just really stand out), but the painted silver trim around the center console is cheap and is begging for scratches. Now on to the best feature of this Acura – the steering wheel. The weight, thickness, and size are perfect. Also, the leather is fairly high quality and the stitching is good. The front seats are comfortable and supportive, yet the backseat legroom is a little cramped.
Andy – I liked the interior for the most part. It’s well appointed and has everything you’d expect in a luxury car. Add doors that close like vaults, absolutely zero rattles, and refined switchgear, and you’ve got an interior that feels very well built. However, there are a ton of buttons. About 12 on the steering wheel and probably double that on the dash. I did like the chunky steering wheel, which felt very sporting. The front seats are comfortable and spacious. The rear seats, however, are cramped. My knees hit the seat backs, and my feet were nearly 100% underneath the seat bottoms—I’m only 5′ 7”, too. Overall, the interior is a comfortable place to spend time, so long as it’s not in the back seat.

Drivetrain (Tae – 7, Andy –
Tae – The 3.5 liter V6 and 5 speed automatic transmission combo is found in most Honda/Acura vehicles, and it does the job very good. Good amount of low-end power (torque) and midrange performance is also good. The transmission is quick and smooth shifting, but with most competitors are offering 6 speeds or more. By going to more speeds might give them better fuel economy numbers – not necessarily for acceleration.
Andy – For me, the engine is the highlight of this car. The powerful 3.5-liter V6 revs smoothly, and sounds great all the way up to its redline. Mash the throttle and traction control will do its best to maintain grip. However, you’ll want to hold the steering wheel tightly, as there is a lot of torque steer. I kept thinking what the car would be like if it were RWD.
The TSX V6 is an effortless cruiser at highway speeds, and has more than ample power for passing and merging. I averaged 19 MPG with the car in mostly city driving—one MPG better than its EPA rating of 18 city. Highway mileage is rated at 27 MPG.
Performance (Tae – 6.5, Andy – 7.5)
Tae – Acura marketing guys have been going on and on about how their cars are superior in performance in the luxury market… sigh. That topic is reserved for another time and section of this website. As with most Nissan and Saab owners already know, FWD (front wheel drive) cars with more than 150TQ will give you a significant torque steer (sudden jerking of the steering wheel upon acceleration). Driving the V6 TSX is just like driving any other FWD ‘performance’ vehicle of today, and I’m sorry to say that the personality that the previous TSX had is mostly gone. The new TSX is big and heavy, it’s not as nimble or fun to drive. As a commuter car, this car would be fine… but as a serious performance vehicle or even a weekend canyon carver, it is not.
Andy – Acceleration is very good with the TSX V6, with 0-60 numbers right around 6 seconds. Really, power is never an issue—something the four-cylinder version is a bit short on. The car’s front double-wishbone and rear multi-link suspension plus its 18” wheels wrapped in meaty tires keep things in check in the curves, too. However, the combination of a FWD drivetrain, all the power, and a 3,680 lb. curb weight keep the TSX from entering ‘nimble’ territory. There’s plenty of power and good grip. Again, if this car were RWD, it might be great.
Ride Quality (Tae – 7.5, Andy – 7.5)
Tae – At a low to moderate pace, the TSX is great. Noise is well controlled, and the bumps and tussling are well damped. Only in high speeds and very sudden, huge bumps that the chassis gets upset. My only gripe is that disjointed feeling in the steering wheel is present when going over bumps, such as railroad tracks. Lastly, the body feels a bit hollow, going over unsettled roads – this trait is very common in Asian cars.
Andy – This is a sports sedan, so it’s not going to have a super-cushy ride. As it should, it rides firmly and controlled, rarely feeling unsettled. I didn’t notice the hollowness Tae mentions; everything felt solid to me. However, even considering this is a sports sedan, the ride isn’t phenomenal; I’d say it’s slightly above average, though. One thing I noticed is the car feels heavy.
Technology (Tae – 7, Andy – 7.5)
Tae – In typical Acura fashion, there are no options or option packages – you get everything or you get everything with Navigation. Items such as Bluetooth, iPod/USB port, high-end audio, satellite radio, and all the safety equipment are there. Our test models had Navigation Systems in it. It is not touchscreen, you control it with either the knob/button combo or your voice. The voice control system is supposed to recognize more than 600 words, and the commands are on the screen as you go. But I’m not a fan of voice control system, just yet… it requires a steep learning curve and the system repeats your command back for confirmation (you can turn off the repeat feature off for smoother interaction). Finally, the ELS sound system is very good, but only with the provided test DVD-audio disc – the radio/CD/iPod sounds are pretty average for luxury car standards.
Andy – There is a ton of technology with this car. However, it’s not all well executed. As mentioned, there are scads of buttons—buttons everywhere! I did like the center GPS control knob/button, which worked well. However, there are so many controls and choices—almost too many—that it becomes difficult to control, especially on the go. I’m also a stickler for simple Bluetooth connectivity, and pairing my Samsung phone with the Acura-Link system was a chore. Plus, every time I got into the car, it would turn on the phone’s music player, thus disabling my phone book. I tried to download my contacts to the car, but it only would download two contacts. If I didn’t know the number off hand (and who does these days?), you’re out of luck.
In addition, the car’s climate control and radio are displayed in a narrow digital display under the color GPS display. This was hard to read, and unintuitive to figure out. All the bells and whistles, but they’re difficult to operate.
Value (Tae – 5, Andy – 4)
Tae – I just cannot give it a very high score here, even if I wanted to. At almost $39k, you can get the scary fast Infiniti G37 with a 330HP engine, a proper rear-wheel drive, bigger interior, better driving dynamics, and 7 speed transmission. You can fancy yourself a fully loaded BMW 328i with the M Sport package for just a couple of grand more. Better yet, for about $500 more you can fetch the larger TL – or even, you can get a 390HP V8 Hyundai Genesis Sedan with a 10 year warranty.
Andy – The TSX Tech V6 is a bit odd to me value wise. You can get into a larger Acura TL with the company’s all-wheel drive system for nearly the same cost. You can even get into a FWD TL for less money than the TSX Tech V6. You will no doubt get class-leading reliability, resale, and refinement, but at what cost? As Tae mentions, there is no shortage of competition out there, and I’d be sure to shop competitors before plunking down nearly $40,000 for a mid-sized FWD sports sedan.

Overall (Tae – 6, Andy – 6.5)
Tae – By adding a V6 engine to the ‘underpowered’ TSX, Acura has effectively priced itself out of market (they are asking $5k more for the V6 engine). Unless you really hate the TL’s looks (and I do), there is not enough justification of purchasing this vehicle. If you’re a diehard Honda/Acura loyalist and must own a European Accord, this is the car for you. For everyone else, there are many better options.
Andy – I’m with Tae on 90% of this. I, too, am not a fan of the TL’s looks, and prefer the TSX’s appearance, which I still don’t find terribly exciting. With the V6, this car is more of a competitor, but the price is just too steep. If I just had to have a TSX, I’d opt for less power, less weight, and less cost and go with the four cylinder model.
-KF