Where was I the last couple of days? I was at the Northwest Automotive Press Association’s (NWAPA) “Run to the Sun.” This annual driving event brings a number of new cars and NWAPA members together for a multi-day driving extravaganza.

The field featured a variety of cars from various segments from entry level to ultra luxury. The list looked like this:

- 2010 Acura TL SH-AWD Tech
- 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
- 2010 Chevrolet Corvette GS Convertible
- 2010 Dodge Challenger R/T
- 2010 Viper SRT10 Coupe
- 2011 Ford Mustang GT Premium
- 2011 Honda CR-Z EX w/Navigation
- 2011 Hyundai Sonata GLS
- 2011 Infiniti M37X AWD
- 2010 Jaguar XFR
- 2010 Jaguar XKR Convertible
- 2010 Kia Forte Koup SX
- 2010 Lexus IS350 Convertible (w/F-Sport parts)


- 2010 Lotus Evora
- 2010 Mazdaspeed3
- 2011 Mercedes-Benz E550 Cabriolet
- 2011 Mercedes SLS AMG
- 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback Ralliart
- Mitsubishi iMiEV
- 2010 Nissan Z Roadster
- 2011 Subaru Impreza WRX STI
- Suzuki Kizashi Turbo Concept
- 2011 Volvo C70 T5 Convertible
- 2010 Volkswagen Jetta TDI Cup Edition

Over the course of three days, I got to drive each one of these cars on some great roads in northwestern Washington. There were a number of remarkable cars. Here are just a couple that really stood out:

Favorite Overall Car: 2011 Ford Mustang GT
Why: I’m a long-time Mustang fan, and the ’11 GT is the total package. They’ve brought the 5.0 back with dual overhead cams, a 7,000 RPM readline, and lots of thrust (412 hp, 390 ft/lbs. of torque). But, it’s more than that. The outstanding combination of comfort, handling, obtainable price, and sound make this such a complete, well-executed package. This American icon continues to be iconic.

Biggest Surprise: Cadillac CTS-V
Why: The CTS-V is a supercharged 6.2-liter V-8-powered luxury sport sedan. I knew it’d be fast, and figured it’d be a “nice” car. However, I didn’t expect it to be as fast or as nice as it was. It goes like hell, sounds like heaven, and has a cool interior (the speedometer and tachometer leave red trails as they rev up—really neat). Here again, the combination of suspension tuning, interior quality, outstanding exhaust note, and overall badassness really impressed me. It’s great to see American cars that are truly impressive!

Favorite Small Car: Honda CR-Z
Why: Hey, this is Subcompact Culture, right? Of the smaller vehicles at the event (not including the excellent Lotus Evora), the Honda CR-Z was a standout, and not just because it’s brand-spakin’ new. The combination of size, shape, and driving dynamics confirmed that the CR-Z is a fun, frugal, and reasonably priced car. The interior is appealing, the exterior looks better in person, and if driven like a hybrid in Eco mode, you will get better-than-EPA-rated fuel economy.

Most Amazing: Mercedes AMG SLS; Viper SRT10 (tie)
Why: Equally amazing cars for way different reasons. It’s a tale of the scalpel versus the sledgehammer. The AMG SLS is extremely fast, yet is easy to pilot, Its gorgeous, inviting and comfortable interior features gullwinged gateways. All superheros should be gifted an SLS AMG.

The Viper is punishingly fast and is more than two handfuls to control. Viper allows you to sit inside it and then makes you hold on for dear life under full throttle. The automotive equivalent of trying to ride a bull. Make that a rabid bull possessed by the devil—but in a totally good way.

They’re both stupendously powerful, perversely extreme in many aspects, and get more stares than Megan Fox at a nude corndog eating contest. And I’ve said too much.

Expect to see some more driving reports about these vehicles soon!

Source – Subcompact Culture

Sometimes trendy things go too far overboard. For example, every ‘media outlet’ wants to hand out annual awards, or even creatively create new categories to promote itself. Heck, even KarFarm might get into that game in the near future.

Ward’s Auto is famous for ‘the 10 best engines’ award. I don’t know if they are subscribing to the ‘even bad press is good publicity’ theory, but check out the list below.

This year’s winners:

  • Subaru Outback (Popular-Priced car under $29,999)
  • Infiniti M56 (Premium-Priced car)
  • Lexus HS 250h (Hybrid car)
  • Chevrolet Camaro (Sports car)
  • Chevrolet Equinox (Popular-Priced truck under $39,999)
  • Volvo XC60 (Premium-Priced truck)
  • Acura ZDX (Design Breakthrough)
  • Mazdaspeed3 (Brand Expression)
  • BMW 550i Gran Turismo (Design Versatility)
  • Porsche Panamera Turbo (Inspired Design)

What is up with these categories? Even more, what’s up with the selection of Mazdaspeed3, Subaru Outback, Acura ZDX, and Chevrolet Camaro?

Acura ZDX is borderline selection in the views of most car nuts, Outback and Mazda shouldn’t be on this list… and the most criminal entry on this list – the Chevy Camaro!

First of all, you can’t see out of a Camaro, the steering wheel is hard (even leather wrapped), plastics and switch gears are borrowed from a rental Cobalt, and the useless ‘retro’ gauges at the bottom of the center stack that nobody can see while driving…

Something tells me that the people at Ward’s haven’t really sat in these vehicles in person. Perhaps, they were comparing press release photos, but Camaro?

- KF

Courtesy of Wards Auto


2010 Acura TSX V6 with Technology Package


Vital Stats

Engine: 3.5 liter V6 (280HP/254TQ)
Drivetrain Layout: Front engine/Front wheel drive
Transmission: 5 Speed Automatic
Seating Capacity: 5 Passengers
EPA Fuel Economy: 18 city/27 highway
Base MSRP $37,950 + $810 (destination charge)
Recommended Options: no options, only accessories available

The Basics
The Acura TSX made its debut, in the US Market, back in 2004. It was basically a rebadged European Market Honda Accord (quite bit smaller than the ‘fat American’ version). The first generation TSX looked tidy, handled great (for a FWD midsize car), and was somewhat a good value for the money.

For the 2009 model year, Acura introduced the second generation TSX (also rebadged Euro Accord). It is significantly bigger, especially the width, but its 2.4 liter 4 cylinder engine was a carryover from the smaller, previous TSX. The second generation TSX, being larger and heavier, wasn’t as quick or nimble to drive.

So what did Honda engineers do to remedy the situation? Of course, they went to the School of American Car Engineering… put a bigger engine in it!

Highs: great fit-and-finish, good power
Lows: not as fun to drive as competitors, button-happy interior, no longer charming

Exterior (Tae – 7, Andy – 7.5)
Tae – Love it or hate it, the Acura’s signature shield/tooth/beak grille is present on the TSX… but out of the current Acura line up, the Shield doesn’t look too out of place on the TSX. When you can pry your eyes off from the grille, the rest of the body is modern and the design is inoffensive and neutral. The stance is fairly wide, giving it somewhat athletic look to the car.

Andy – Also not a fan of the chrome grille treatment, although it looks better on the TSX than just about any other Acura. The rest of the car is typical Honda/Acura understatement—classy and sophisticated, but it doesn’t do much to excite me.

Interior (Tae – 7, Andy – 8)
Tae – Can we say button-porn??? Buttons galore! It’s as if Honda’s interior designers purposely dedicated a button for each function of the vehicle, maybe they had old people in mind. They really could have trimmed down on the number of buttons. Another thing is that if you put this interior next to the regular everyday Euro Accord (or even the American Accord); it is pretty much the same – Acura is supposed to be a ‘premium brand’, right? I really hate to keep going on about the negatives about this interior (it’s really not that bad, but the bad parts just really stand out), but the painted silver trim around the center console is cheap and is begging for scratches. Now on to the best feature of this Acura – the steering wheel. The weight, thickness, and size are perfect. Also, the leather is fairly high quality and the stitching is good. The front seats are comfortable and supportive, yet the backseat legroom is a little cramped.

Andy – I liked the interior for the most part. It’s well appointed and has everything you’d expect in a luxury car. Add doors that close like vaults, absolutely zero rattles, and refined switchgear, and you’ve got an interior that feels very well built. However, there are a ton of buttons. About 12 on the steering wheel and probably double that on the dash. I did like the chunky steering wheel, which felt very sporting. The front seats are comfortable and spacious. The rear seats, however, are cramped. My knees hit the seat backs, and my feet were nearly 100% underneath the seat bottoms—I’m only 5′ 7”, too. Overall, the interior is a comfortable place to spend time, so long as it’s not in the back seat.

Drivetrain (Tae – 7, Andy – 8)
Tae – The 3.5 liter V6 and 5 speed automatic transmission combo is found in most Honda/Acura vehicles, and it does the job very good. Good amount of low-end power (torque) and midrange performance is also good. The transmission is quick and smooth shifting, but with most competitors are offering 6 speeds or more. By going to more speeds might give them better fuel economy numbers – not necessarily for acceleration.

Andy – For me, the engine is the highlight of this car. The powerful 3.5-liter V6 revs smoothly, and sounds great all the way up to its redline.  Mash the throttle and traction control will do its best to maintain grip. However, you’ll want to hold the steering wheel tightly, as there is a lot of torque steer. I kept thinking what the car would be like if it were RWD.

The TSX V6 is an effortless cruiser at highway speeds, and has more than ample power for passing and merging. I averaged 19 MPG with the car in mostly city driving—one MPG better than its EPA rating of 18 city. Highway mileage is rated at 27 MPG.

Performance (Tae – 6.5, Andy – 7.5)
Tae – Acura marketing guys have been going on and on about how their cars are superior in performance in the luxury market… sigh. That topic is reserved for another time and section of this website. As with most Nissan and Saab owners already know, FWD (front wheel drive) cars with more than 150TQ will give you a significant torque steer (sudden jerking of the steering wheel upon acceleration). Driving the V6 TSX is just like driving any other FWD ‘performance’ vehicle of today, and I’m sorry to say that the personality that the previous TSX had is mostly gone. The new TSX is big and heavy, it’s not as nimble or fun to drive. As a commuter car, this car would be fine… but as a serious performance vehicle or even a weekend canyon carver, it is not.

Andy – Acceleration is very good with the TSX V6, with 0-60 numbers right around 6 seconds. Really, power is never an issue—something the four-cylinder version is a bit short on. The car’s front double-wishbone and rear multi-link suspension plus its 18” wheels wrapped in meaty tires keep things in check in the curves, too. However, the combination of a FWD drivetrain, all the power, and a 3,680 lb. curb weight keep the TSX from entering ‘nimble’ territory. There’s plenty of power and good grip. Again, if this car were RWD, it might be great.

Ride Quality (Tae – 7.5, Andy – 7.5)
Tae – At a low to moderate pace, the TSX is great. Noise is well controlled, and the bumps and tussling are well damped. Only in high speeds and very sudden, huge bumps that the chassis gets upset. My only gripe is that disjointed feeling in the steering wheel is present when going over bumps, such as railroad tracks.  Lastly, the body feels a bit hollow, going over unsettled roads – this trait is very common in Asian cars.

Andy –  This is a sports sedan, so it’s not going to have a super-cushy ride. As it should, it rides firmly and controlled, rarely feeling unsettled. I didn’t notice the hollowness Tae mentions; everything felt solid to me. However, even considering this is a sports sedan, the ride isn’t phenomenal; I’d say it’s slightly above average, though. One thing I noticed is the car feels heavy.

Technology (Tae – 7, Andy – 7.5)
Tae – In typical Acura fashion, there are no options or option packages – you get everything or you get everything with Navigation.  Items such as Bluetooth, iPod/USB port, high-end audio, satellite radio, and all the safety equipment are there. Our test models had Navigation Systems in it. It is not touchscreen, you control it with either the knob/button combo or your voice. The voice control system is supposed to recognize more than 600 words, and the commands are on the screen as you go. But I’m not a fan of voice control system, just yet… it requires a steep learning curve and the system repeats your command back for confirmation (you can turn off the repeat feature off for smoother interaction). Finally, the ELS sound system is very good, but only with the provided test DVD-audio disc – the radio/CD/iPod sounds are pretty average for luxury car standards.

Andy – There is a ton of technology with this car. However, it’s not all well executed. As mentioned, there are scads of buttons—buttons everywhere! I did like the center GPS control knob/button, which worked well. However, there are so many controls and choices—almost too many—that it becomes difficult to control, especially on the go. I’m also a stickler for simple Bluetooth connectivity, and pairing my Samsung phone with the Acura-Link system was a chore. Plus, every time I got into the car, it would turn on the phone’s music player, thus disabling my phone book. I tried to download my contacts to the car, but it only would download two contacts. If I didn’t know the number off hand (and who does these days?), you’re out of luck.

In addition, the car’s climate control and radio are displayed in a narrow digital display under the color GPS display. This was hard to read, and unintuitive to figure out. All the bells and whistles, but they’re difficult to operate.

Value (Tae – 5, Andy – 4)
Tae – I just cannot give it a very high score here, even if I wanted to. At almost $39k, you can get the scary fast Infiniti G37 with a 330HP engine, a proper rear-wheel drive, bigger interior, better driving dynamics, and 7 speed transmission. You can fancy yourself a fully loaded BMW 328i with the M Sport package for just a couple of grand more. Better yet, for about $500 more you can fetch the larger TL – or even, you can get a 390HP V8 Hyundai Genesis Sedan with a 10 year warranty.

Andy – The TSX Tech V6 is a bit odd to me value wise. You can get into a larger Acura TL with the company’s all-wheel drive system for nearly the same cost. You can even get into a FWD TL for less money than the TSX Tech V6. You will no doubt get class-leading reliability, resale, and refinement, but at what cost? As Tae mentions, there is no shortage of competition out there, and I’d be sure to shop competitors before plunking down nearly $40,000 for a mid-sized FWD sports sedan.

Overall (Tae – 6, Andy – 6.5)
Tae – By adding a V6 engine to the ‘underpowered’ TSX, Acura has effectively priced itself out of market (they are asking $5k more for the V6 engine). Unless you really hate the TL’s looks (and I do), there is not enough justification of purchasing this vehicle. If you’re a diehard Honda/Acura loyalist and must own a European Accord, this is the car for you. For everyone else, there are many better options.

Andy – I’m with Tae on 90% of this. I, too, am not a fan of the TL’s looks, and prefer the TSX’s appearance, which I still don’t find terribly exciting. With the V6, this car is more of a competitor, but the price is just too steep. If I just had to have a TSX, I’d opt for less power, less weight, and less cost and go with the four cylinder model.

-KF

The US has always been an interesting market for auto makers to tackle. Many of them would create seeming hit models only to fall flat in the end. Take for example the mid 90′s BMW 3 Series. The car was a success both in Europe and the US, so naturally BMW decided to add the hatch back version to the US line-up thinking that it would share the same success it saw in Europe. Unfortunately, sales were less than impressive so the 3 Series hatch never saw US soil again. Both foreign and domestic automakers have always been reluctant to bring models they have in other countries to the US. Weather it be the restraints of emission and safety regulations or hatchback-phobia, the US has missed out on some absolutely brilliant cars that have been the desire of car fans across the country. In no particular order, here are 10 of the models that touched our hearts but never touched our home soil (well, not officially).

2003 BMW M3 CSL (E46)
bmw-m3-cslCoupe, Sport, Light. With even the slightest mention of these words near any BMW fan in the US, they’ll start drooling and panting uncontrollably. Shortly after they will pull every last hair on their head, fall to their knees and in a mad fit of rage and confusion, scream to the car gods, “WHY?! WHY NOT HERE?” OK, not exactly, but that is the equivalent emotion felt by avid BMW fans who long for this car. It was more powerful, louder, lighter, lower, stiffer, grippier, and above all, more fun than the already popular M3. Visually the car had subtle additions like the carbon fiber roof, a bumper mounted intake, a more aerodynamically sculpted trunk, and bigger, lighter wheels. Underneath the hood was a different story. What BMW did to the 3 Series to make the M3 is the same thing they did to make the M3 CSL from the M3 (So would this be the M-M3?). It’s performance increase over the M3 is significant and quantifiable but utterly irrelevant. Tiff Needell of Brittan’s 5th Gear TV show once screamed, “I don’t care if it is faster! I just sounds faster!” as he plowed up through the gears. This car brought back the true spirit of “M.” Initially the M3 CSL had no radio, no AC, no leather, and was only available in SMG (which did perform better on the track). Comfort and convenience went out the window and performance was the sole focus, a feat last seen only in the first ever M3 (E30). Why the US never saw this masterpiece is beyond me. If BMW managed to get the M3 CSL here legally, it would have instantly sold out.

1999-2002 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec (R34)
nissan-skyline-gtr-r34-blueOK so we finally have the GT-R here, but we never saw this one. This was the first of the Skylines to really jump off the technological deep end. It was the first real-life video game. Like the Nissan GT-R we now have, this car could make even the most appalling drivers look like pros. Whatever mistake you made, the committee of on-board computers would make appropriate corrections by diverting power funds to the proper locations. This car could read your mind. Whatever you were trying to do, it somehow knew what  you wanted and gave you more. Couple that to its estimated 350BHP turbocharged 2.6L in-line six and you had a car that was almost unstoppable.  All of the advantages of front, rear and all-wheel drive were present with few of the disadvantages. As if this wasn’t enough, Nissan made the V-Spec Nur variant, which improved the already fantastic suspension and engine. In 2007, our prayer was finally answered. The successor to the R34 Skyline, the Nissan GT-R (R35) arrived in US showrooms and quickly sold out for more than MSRP. Just don’t try to import an R34, even through Florida; it just may end up crushed into tin cans when the Fed’s find out, and that my car enthusiast friends, is a crime against humanity.

1997-2000 and 2001-2005 Honda Civic Type R (EP and EK)
civic-typer-epThe Type R badge is the rice rocket wet dream. Honda had great success with the Integra Type R in the US.  Before the great crash of the auto industry, a used Integra Type R in good condition would cost you well over $20,000. However, no other Type R made it to the US. Hatchback-phobia again is the problem with the Civic Type R. Critics hailed this souped-up city runabout as the typical high revving torqueless go-cart we’ve all come to expect from Honda. Although the newer EP’s suspension was less advanced as its predecessors double wishbone, it handled as well as the best of its competition.

honda-civic-type-r-ek9The US did get the hatchback Civic Si, an anemic version of the Civic Type R, but it was not nearly as successful as its sedan predecessor, which played a large roll in Honda’s decision not to introduce the Type R in the US. Like the BMW M3 CSL, the Type R does not simply represent higher performance numbers. It represents a huge worldwide following which some have dubbed a religion. Other cars that received the Type R treatment include the Accord and NSX. The removal of sound insulation and the addition of under-body aero lead the NSX Type R to nearly tie the Ferrari 360 Challenge Stradale’s lap time of the Nürburgring Nordschleife. Do not despair for there is good news for the Civic Type R in the US! A Type R sedan had been released in Japan with speculation that it might come Stateside. We’ll keep you posted.

1991-1993 Lancia Delta Integrale
800px-lancia_delta_integrale_evo_2_img_9403Considered to be the world’s ultimate hot hatch, the Lancia Delta Integrale first hit Europe’s streets in1991. Many things we consider as ordinary features on most cars today were standard on this high performance model Delta. It had a 2.0L turbo four that churned 215HP and came with an advanced torsion AWD unit capable of sending power as need to wheels that had more traction with a distribution of almost 50:50 front to rear, perfect for lurid slides in the dirt. But the engine and drive train were relatively unchanged from it’s lesser Turbo HF leaving the only difference to the suspension.  The Delta Integrale was wider and stiffer giving it better performance on and off road. (Yes I did say off road) It’s most distinguishing feature are the rally inspired light weight wheels and aggressive body kit resembling it’s rally counterpart.  In 1993, computers were added to the cars brain which gave it variable ignition timing, less intrusive emission control, idle control (VW MkII fans will appreciate this), and boost control which reduced turbo lag. Emission laws again spoil our fun in the US and that inexplicable fear of hatches. However, look closely and you’ll find a few gray market imports lurking about. I spotted a black one in San Mateo, California just a few blocks from downtown.

1998 Subaru Imprezza 22B STi/WRX STi Type R
1998_subaru_impreza_22b_sti-2The Imprezza 22B sold out just after it went on sale. It was in such high demand that it was rumored even the late Colin McRae had to pay for his.  For those of you who are unfamiliar with this beast, Subaru decided to celebrate their 40th birthday and dominant 3rd title of World Rally Championship by making the 22B. Their driver, Colin McRae, was largely responsible for their success that year. Subaru claimed their car made 276BHP, the mandated limit for cars sold in Japan, but many have spun the dyno rollers at a higher number.  Although it was based on the Imprezza chassis, the 22B was noticeably wider and was equipped with road clawing suspension, eye-popping brakes and a more aggressive AWD setup.  The WRX Coupe R the common man’s 22B.  It lacked the wide body and power but had equally aggressive suspension and had a detuned version of the 22B’s engine. Both cars had enough power to hurl themselves up against their top-gear rev limiter thanks to the short ratio differential. This made it the perfect weekend track warrior. Emission laws barred these mischievous siblings from the US.

2002-2003 Ford Focus RS
ford_focus_rs_frontThe biggest criticism of American cars is the notion that they are undesirable. Well, here’s a very desirable one. Meet the Ford Focus RS. It’s a more powerful, more nimble Focus.  Ford’s European design division came up with the internationally successful Focus and consequently entered it into WRC competition which was also driven by Colin McRae. Their tribute car came in the form of the Focus RS. Though not a huge departure from the standard Focus, the first RS was equipped with a 2.0L turbo four producing a modest 205 HP. Earlier this year, the second generation Focus RS hit European showrooms with a whopping 300+HP turbocharged five-cylinder from Volvo. The first generation Focus RS would have been a patriotic and unique alternative to the Japanese Evo’s and STI’s. More importantly it might have helped put the US automaker back on the map at home.

1957-1975 Fiat Abarth 600/695/850
header_89675No, the year range is not a typo. This is one of Italy’s most quintessential cars. Its style and superior performance was everything that was Italian all in a compact aluminium shell with wheels. In Italy during the 60′s a gorgeous woman could be called “Abarthizzata.” Other than working it’s way into modern Italian vocabulary, the Abarth’s racing counterparts were successful in their classes which included touring cars. Early versions put out only a mere 27BHP while the later 850SS models were rated a almost 100BHP and were capable of reaching speeds close to 120MPH. Fiat has revived this model in Europe and has specifically announced its plans to bring the car to America. With its purchase of Chrysler, Fiat has perfect distribution method for the 500 Abarth. Just as BMW did with Mini, Fiat will sell the 500 through Chrysler dealerships.

1986-1989 Porsche 959
959-3We have yet another car inspired by rally racing; this one is from the Group B era. For those who don’t know, Group B era ended because the cars were too fast and too dangerous. So, Porsche decided to make a production version of the car that was too dangerous for racing drivers. This monstrosity gave new meaning to the word ridiculous. Remember, this car showed up in the mid 80′s and could time warp you to 60MPH in 3.7 seconds and to the quarter mile in 11.8 seconds.  These figures were pure insanity in the 80′s. The only car to out accelerate the 959 was the famed McLaren F1, which showed up in the 90′s. Speed wasn’t the only thing it had. Style, reliability and handling were in equal abundance.  The Porsche-Steuer Kupplung (PSK) AWD unit, the most advanced of its time, could direct 80% of available power to the rear when needed, the shocks could be adjusted electronically to various comfort and sport settings, it’s aerodynamics produced no lift which made it drivable at its top speed of almost 200MPH, and it sported super light weight magnesium alloy wheels which burn a blinding white when lit on fire. Porsche refused to send the US Department of Transportation the four 959s required for crash testing, so the car was never brought here by Porsche. However, since the “Show and Display” law, the car now meets crash test standards and can be fitted with emissions equipment to make the car legal in the US.

1983-1991 Audi Sport Quattro
97_audi_sport_quattro_1985_01_bThis is the great grandmother of all of Audi’s AWD cars. The Audi Sport Quattro housed the same AWD unit used in Audi’s legendary Group B rally car and has been handed down to all of Audi’s cars. Quattro is the pride of all Audi fans and it was the reason of the car’s dominance in Group B. The rally version eventually made well over 500BHP and is still one of the most powerful rally cars ever built. The production version made a modest 305BHP from a 2.1L in-line five. Even 17 years later, the Audi Sport Quattro could up keep up with the far more advanced Mitsubishi Lance Evolution VI. Only 224 were ever made and none were sent to the US, although gray market cars have been spotted. Emission laws again prove to be a thorn in the side of many automakers attempting to bring cars into the US.

1990-1994 Nissan Pulsar GTi-R
nissan_pulsar_gti-r_1Yet another feather-weight rally inspired hot hatch that never saw the Red, White, and Blue. This car is like a baby Skyline GT-R. It had similar AWD unit and an exclusive turbo-charged engine with 2 less cylinders and 1 liter less displacement. Other goodies included a snazzy body kit, sporty suspension, and big brakes. This car was available in left hand drive but only made it as far as UK in its westward travels. It was very quick for its day and had a matching chassis making a great competitor to the Subaru WRX and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, but in a smaller, cuter package.

-KF

The car that started it all. The Acura Legend.

The car that started it all. The Acura Legend.

When the Honda executives decided to market its flagship vehicle in the U.S., they made a wise decision to create a new brand. Back in 1986, there was no way that the public would pay more than $20,000 for a Honda. Honda and other Japanese imports still had a stigma of being cheap, reliable cars. Nothing about them said anything luxury. Just think Hyundai about 3 or 4 year ago, in the pre-Genesis days.

They created a new brand and logo by closing the gap on the top of the ‘H’ logo to resemble a set of calipers, and called it Acura. With the introduction of the Legend and Integra, Acura was an instant success. The Acura Legend could be had with luxury amenities found in most luxury cars such as leather interior, sunroof, premium audio, power accessories, and a powerful six cylinder engine. Integra was a fun-to-drive, economical, compact car for those who wanted a little more than a Civic.

The Integra made performance luxury affordable.

The Integra made 'performance-luxury' affordable.

In the late 80′s, being the only Japanese premium marque, Acura marketed itself to be the luxury sport brand. And it worked. Then came Toyota and Nissan with Lexus and Infiniti, respectively. By the mid 90′s, one particular competitor has not only passed them up, but have become a dominant name in the segment. The nameplate was Lexus. Lexus’s wild success made Infiniti go back to the drawing board several times, and Acura was forced into a niche market.

Fast forward to today, and you have Lexus as the best selling luxury marque in the U.S.. Infiniti established itself as the performance luxury brand. What about Acura? Well… They have become a ‘ultra-Accord’ brand.

All of today's Acuras feature the controversial 'shield' grill.

All of today's Acuras feature the controversial 'shield' grill.

TSX is a European Honda Accord, TL is a fancy American Accord, RL is a larger Accord, RSX is a TSX cross-over, and MDX is an RL cross-over. So the whole entire line-up being a variation of the Accord, can they really be called a luxury brand? Not a single RWD vehicle, nothing larger than a 3.7 liter V6 in their stable, what type of customers are they attracting?

Some will argue that Infiniti is a one-trick pony as well with everything being a variation of a the G-series. That is true, but the Nissan’s premium brand has somethings that luxury buyers look for – rear-wheel drive chassis and V8 engines. What about Audi? All Audis are AWD and offer V8 and V10 engines in the top sedans and coupes.

The plan for the Acura brand, as late as early 2009, was to have a RWD chassis and at least a V8 engine. But they have canceled that development, blaming the global economical downturn. We argue that Honda cannot afford not to develop a RWD chassis and at least a V8 engine to stay competitive in this market. Or, they might as well as change their Acura brand name to ‘Accora’.

-KF